umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Inconsistency in policy elites’ support for movement claims: Feminist advocacy in two regions of Peru
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Umeå Centre for Gender Studies (UCGS).ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1975-9060
2013 (English)In: Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change / [ed] Patrick G. Coy, Bingley, U.K.: Emerald , 2013, Vol. 36, 107-132 p.Chapter in book (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

This paper bridges cultural and political approaches to determine why elite support for movement claims may be inconsistent across the policy process. I analyze this question empirically through sixteen in-depth interviews with government officials in two regions of Peru: Arequipa and Cusco. Regional officials’ appraised feminist advocacy in two opposing ways. First, they valued feminist advocates’ contributions to policy processes, which enabled them to advance reproductive rights and gender equity initiatives. They also perceived women as a group deserving of these initiatives and framed gender policies in terms of rights and equality. Second, they were critical of feminist advocates’ weaknesses in mobilizing support, which hindered the officials’ own ability to advance reproductive rights and gender equity initiatives. Furthermore, regional officials understood reproductive rights and gender equality to be thwarted by the State’s economic instrumentalism and by the Catholic Church’s ultra-conservatism. This research shows how a cultural approach to policy elites’ support for movement claims goes beyond their individual attitudes and calculations to capture their perceptions, frames and understandings tied to the broader cultural context. This wider conceptualization in turn helps clarify inconsistencies in policy elites’ support for movement claims across the policy process.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Bingley, U.K.: Emerald , 2013. Vol. 36, 107-132 p.
Series
Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change, ISSN 0163-786X ; 36
Keyword [en]
Cultural approach, feminist advocacy, movement claims, policy elites’ support, Peru
National Category
Sociology (excluding Social Work, Social Psychology and Social Anthropology)
Research subject
Sociology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-67656ISBN: 9781781907337 (electronic)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-67656DiVA: diva2:613007
Note

This work was undertaken through the generous support from the Department of Sociology, Umeå University, Stiftelsen Lars Hiertas Minne Fond, and JC Kempes Minnes Akademiska Forskningsfond.

Available from: 2013-03-26 Created: 2013-03-26 Last updated: 2015-03-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Authority records BETA

Coe, Anna-Britt

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Coe, Anna-Britt
By organisation
Umeå Centre for Gender Studies (UCGS)
Sociology (excluding Social Work, Social Psychology and Social Anthropology)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 292 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf