Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Switch to biological agent in psoriasis significantly improved clinical and patient-reported outcomes in real-world practice
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Dermatology and Venerology.
Department of Clinical Sciences, Skåne University Hospital, Clinical Research, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Institute for Economic Research, School of Economics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Dermatology and Venerology.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3858-8474
2012 (English)In: Dermatology, ISSN 1018-8665, E-ISSN 1420-9832, Vol. 225, no 4, 326-332 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Although clinical studies have shown efficacy of biological agents in moderate to severe psoriasis, observational studies of real-world effectiveness are rare.

Objective: To analyse the psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) and quality of life by the EQ-5D questionnaire and dermatology quality of life index (DLQI) in psoriasis patients who switched from conventional systemic treatment to biological agents in clinical practice. Furthermore, to analyse patient groups with the highest benefit of biological agents.

Methods: Longitudinal, observational study based on the Swedish National Registry for Systemic Treatment of Pso-riasis, PsoReg. Outcomes of biological-naïve patients who switched to a biological agent (n = 267) were analysed before switch and at the first follow-up.

Results: Patients significantly improved in EQ-5D, DLQI and PASI (p < 0.001). Patients with DLQI ≥10 and/or PASI ≥10 had the greatest benefits from biological agents in terms of EQ-5D.

Conclusions: Patients with moderate to severe psoriasis benefit from biological agents in clinical practice; the patients with the highest benefits were those with high pretreatment PASI and DLQI scores.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
S. Karger, 2012. Vol. 225, no 4, 326-332 p.
Keyword [en]
Biological agents, Psoriasis, EQ-5D, DLQI, PASI, Register

National Category
Dermatology and Venereal Diseases
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-67666DOI: 10.1159/000345715ISI: 000315976300007PubMedID: 23328678OAI: diva2:613197
Available from: 2013-03-26 Created: 2013-03-26 Last updated: 2014-06-30Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Effectiveness and costs of new medical technologies: register-based research in psoriasis
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Effectiveness and costs of new medical technologies: register-based research in psoriasis
2013 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Psoriasis is a chronic, immunological and systemic disease with an estimated prevalence of about 2-3 percent. Psoriasis is associated with the joint disease psoriasis arthropathy. There are several treatments options available for psoriasis and patients with moderate to severe psoriasis generally need systemic agents. In 2004 biologics were introduced for patients with moderate to severe psoriasis in Sweden.

The overall objective of this thesis was to assess the relationship between Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and clinical outcome measures in psoriasis patients, to analyse the effectiveness of biologics in psoriasis in everyday clinical practice and to explore how costs of the psoriasis population changed after the introduction of biologics in Sweden.

Methods: Research was based on national administrative registers and PsoReg, the Swedish registry for systemic treatment of psoriasis. In a cross-sectional study (paper I) the three outcome measures: the generic HRQOL measure EQ-5D, the dermatology specific HRQOL measure the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and the clinical measure of skin involvement, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), were analysed by demographic characteristics. The generic EQ-5D among psoriasis patients was compared to previously published values for the general population in Sweden. Relationships between measures were examined with correlation tests and regression analysis. A longitudinal study included patients registered in PsoReg who switched to a biologic agent for the first time during registration (paper II). The three outcomes EQ-5D, DLQI, and PASI were analysed before and after switch in the overall patient group and in subgroups. The relative effectiveness of continuing with the standard care of conventional treatment compared to switching from standard care to biologics was analysed in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis (paper III). Patients in PsoReg were matched with propensity scores and average treatment effects were estimated. The estimated outcomes were the change of EQ-5D, DLQI, and PASI. Patients were identified in national registers at the National Board of Health and Welfare when analysing costs; either by a registration of a psoriasis diagnosis in the national patients register and/or by a registration in the prescribed drugs register of a topical treatment with calcipotriol, a substance which has the indication psoriasis only (paper IV). Direct costs included patients’ visits in specialist health care and prescribed drugs used for psoriasis treatment, retrieved from the national patients register and the prescribed drugs register, respectively. Indirect costs included productivity loss in terms of sick leave and disability pension, which estimated as excess costs compared to controls. Controls were selected from the normal population and matched on sex, age and municipality. Productivity loss was estimated based on data from the Longitudinal integration database for health insurance and labour market studies at Statistics Sweden.

Results: Patients with moderate to severe psoriasis had significantly lower HRQOL in EQ-5D than the general population (paper I). Women rated their HRQOL lower than men, even though men had more severe clinical skin involvement than women. (paper I). The generic measure EQ-5D and the dermatology-specific DLQI had moderate correlations whereas EQ-5D had low correlation with the clinical measure PASI (paper I). Patients who switched to a biologic agent during registration in PsoReg had significant improvements in all outcomes (paper II). Patients who fulfilled the criteria for moderate to severe psoriasis had the highest benefits of the biologic agents (paper II). The matched conventionally and biologically treated patients with moderate to severe psoriasis were essentially equal in important observable variables (paper III). The subgroup of patients not responding to conventional treatment had high potential benefits of biologic agents (paper III). Individuals with psoriasis had sick leave and disability pension to a larger extent than their matched controls (paper IV). Direct costs increased, whereas the indirect costs of productivity loss decreased between 2006 and 2009 (paper IV).

Conclusion: Psoriasis is associated both with direct costs and indirect costs, and it has a negative impact on patients’ HRQOL. When evaluating psoriasis treatments and making decisions about treatment guidelines, both generic, dermatology-specific HRQOL measures, and clinical measures are necessary; as they answer to different needs. Although dependent on data quality, generalisability, and current pricing, results suggest that conventional treatments are suitable as first line and biologic agents as second line treatment. Results indicate that the different types of systemic treatments are not allocated optimally among patients with psoriasis in Swedish clinical practice.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Umeå: Umeå universitet, 2013. 54 p.
Umeå University medical dissertations, ISSN 0346-6612 ; 1606
Psoriasis, registers, EQ-5D, DLQI, PASI, biologics
National Category
Dermatology and Venereal Diseases
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-81899 (URN)978-91-7459-740-0 (ISBN)
Public defence
2013-11-14, Bergasalen hörsal, Norrlands Universitetsjukhus, Umeå, 10:00 (Swedish)
Available from: 2013-10-23 Created: 2013-10-22 Last updated: 2014-06-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Norlin, Jenny MSchmitt-Egenolf, Marcus
By organisation
Dermatology and Venerology
In the same journal
Dermatology and Venereal Diseases

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 103 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link