umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Ett djurförbud enligt 29 § Djurskyddslagen (1988:534) – gäller det för all framtid?: En studie om omprövade djurförbud
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences.
2013 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

The purpose of this study was to investigate the criteria that Sweden's county administrative boards use when reconsidering prohibition against owning or taking care of animals according to 29 § Animal Welfare Act (SFS 1988:534). The survey was conducted in two parts. The method for the first part consisted of a web-based survey to all Swedish county administrative boards. The questions covered the decision under § 29 Animal Welfare Act (SFS 1988:534), focusing on reconsideration of prohibition against owning or taking care of animals. The method for part two consisted of a study of all requests for reconsideration of prohibition against owning or taking care of animals for the period 1 January 2010 - 31 December 2012 by Swedish county administrative boards. The response rate for the survey was 57%. The results show that the criteria applied when reassessing prohibition against owning or taking care of animals rejected are: no changed circumstances, no changes in living conditions, lack of insight, short elapsed time and the absence of proof. For prohibition against owning or taking care of animals repealed entirely or partially applied criteria are: changing living conditions, prohibition against owning or taking care of animal’s long time, improvement of the social situation and certificates. As the reviewed prohibition against owning or taking care of animals in this study is not regulated by the Animal Welfare Act or given any support from the preliminary work, the opinions of county administrative boards on criteria become very central.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. , 45 p.
Keyword [en]
animals, prohibition, county administrative board
National Category
Agricultural Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-76202OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-76202DiVA: diva2:635580
Subject / course
Examensarbete i miljö och hälsoskydd
Educational program
Bachelor of Science in Environmental Health
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2013-07-05 Created: 2013-07-04 Last updated: 2013-07-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

By organisation
Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences
Agricultural Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 99 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf