At the centre of what?: a critical note on the centrism-terminology in environmental ethics
2013 (English)In: Environmental Values, ISSN 0963-2719, E-ISSN 1752-7015, Vol. 22, no 5, 627-645 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
The distinction between anthropocentric and non-anthropocentric theories, together with the more fine-grained distinction between anthropocentrism, biocentrism and ecocentrism, are probably two of the most frequently occurring distinctions in the environmental ethics literature. In this essay I draw attention to some problematic aspects of the terminology used to draw these distinctions: the ‘centrism-terminology’. I argue that this terminology is ambiguous and misleading, and therefore confusing. Furthermore, depending on which interpretation it is given, it is also either asymmetric and non-inclusive, or superfluous. Although I find it unlikely that the centrism-terminology will be abandoned, I end the essay by providing a suggestion for an alternative way to categorise theories in environmental ethics.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Isle of Harris: White Horse Press, 2013. Vol. 22, no 5, 627-645 p.
anthropocentrism, non-anthropocentrism, ecocentrism, biocentrism, environmental ethics
Research subject Ethics; Practical Philosophy
IdentifiersURN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-80912DOI: 10.3197/096327113X13745164553879ISI: 000325669500005OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-80912DiVA: diva2:651952