Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Field evaluation of two diffusive samplers and two adsorbent media to determine 1,3-butadiene and benzene levels in air
Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg.
Department of Work and the Physical Environment, National Institute for Working Life, Umeå.
Department of Work and the Physical Environment, National Institute for Working Life, Umeå.
Department of Work and the Physical Environment, National Institute for Working Life, Umeå.
Show others and affiliations
2006 (English)In: Atmospheric Environment, ISSN 1352-2310, Vol. 40, no 40, 7686-7695 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Two types of diffusive samplers, both of which are compatible with thermal desorption, but differ in their geometry-SKC-Ultra (badge-type) and Radiello (radial symmetry-type)-were evaluated indoors and outdoors under varying temperature, humidity and wind speed conditions, using the graphitized adsorbents Carbopack X or Carbograph 5 to measure 1,3-butadiene and benzene in ambient air. The results obtained by diffusive sampling were compared with results obtained using a conventional active sampling method over both long (1 week) and shorter periods (6-24 h). Analysis and detection were performed using an automatic thermal desorber (ATD) connected to a gas chromatograph-flame ionization detector (GC/FID). Results from each sampler and adsorbent combination were examined using ordinary or multiple linear regression analysis. The overall uncertainty (OU) was also determined. In general, the results obtained with both samplers showed good agreement with those obtained by active sampling. Carbopack X appeared to be a more efficient adsorbent than Carbograph 5 for 1,3-butadiene, but the two adsorbents were equivalent for benzene. No effects of either humidity or air velocity were observed. Minor temperature effects were observed for both samplers for 1,3-butadiene. In summary, the results confirmed the accuracy of sampling rates previously determined for the two samplers and adsorbents. We consider the two samplers to be suitable for stationary and personal monitoring for the general population of 1,3-butadiene and benzene in various environments, indoors and outdoors. They are almost independent of meteorological conditions and may be suitable for monitoring industrial atmospheres.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2006. Vol. 40, no 40, 7686-7695 p.
Keyword [en]
Air contaminants, Diffusive samplers, Exposure, Monitoring, VOCs, Atmospheric humidity, Benzene, Diffusion, Sampling, Thermal effects, Volatile organic compounds, Ionization detectors, Thermal desorption, Air quality, adsorption, diffusivity, environmental monitoring, pollution monitoring
National Category
Chemical Sciences Meteorology and Atmospheric Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-83456DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.08.005ISI: 000243055600003OAI: diva2:667379
Available from: 2013-11-26 Created: 2013-11-26 Last updated: 2014-04-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Levin, Jan-Olof
In the same journal
Atmospheric Environment
Chemical SciencesMeteorology and Atmospheric Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 64 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link