Comparison of sampling methods for 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate, (HDI) in a commercial spray box
2002 (English)In: The Analyst, ISSN 0003-2654, E-ISSN 1364-5528, Vol. 127, no 1, 169-173 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
In this study three different types of samplers for the determination of 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate in air were compared. The experimental set up was a simulation of real life conditions with spray painting operations performed inside a commercial, full sized, spray box. The sampling methods were 1-(2-methoxyphenyl)-piperazine impregnated on glass fibre filter, and the same reagent in impinger, and also dibutylamine in impinger. All analyses were performed by LC-MS-MS. The determined concentrations varied between 20 and 90 microg m(-3) with relative standard deviations from 7 to 17% for each method. No significant difference was found between the three methods using ANOVA with a significance level of alpha = 0.05.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Royal Society of Chemistry, 2002. Vol. 127, no 1, 169-173 p.
IdentifiersURN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-83467DOI: 10.1039/b108249cISI: 000173475200034PubMedID: 11827386OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-83467DiVA: diva2:667415