umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Is there a difference in the pattern of muscle activity when performing neck exercises with a guild board versus a pulley?
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Chemistry. Computational Life Science Cluster, Umeå University, Umeå.
2013 (English)In: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, ISSN 1650-1977, E-ISSN 1651-2081, Vol. 45, no 9, 900-905 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective: Guild boards and pulleys are apparatus commonly used to train cervical muscle function for their purported benefit in facilitating activity of the deeper muscle layers, although this effect has not been substantiated. The objective of this study was to compare the activity of the different layers of cervical muscles when performing exercise with these 2 types of apparatus.

Subjects: A total of 19 healthy persons (mean age 28 years, (standard deviation 7 years).

Design: Ultrasound measurements of muscle deformation and deformation rate were recorded from the dorsal and ventral neck muscle layers during extension and flexion exercises. Pulley exercises were performed in the upright sitting position against a standardized resistance (men 2 kg, women 1 kg) and guild board exercises at an angle of 45 degrees.

Results: The dorsal muscles generally showed greater levels of deformation and deformation rate during exercise with the guild board compared with the pulley system (p<0.05), but with no significant differences in relative activity between the deep and superficial muscle layers (condition x muscle interaction (p>0.05)). No differences were observed for the ventral muscles between exercise methods (p>0.05).

Conclusion: While both exercise methods appear to train cervical muscle function, neither appear to be more selective in facilitating deep cervical muscle activity, probably as they involve very similar cervical kinematics.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stiftelsen Rehabiliteringsinformation , 2013. Vol. 45, no 9, 900-905 p.
Keyword [en]
neck muscles, muscle activity, ultrasonography, exercise
National Category
Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-83640DOI: 10.2340/16501977-1196ISI: 000326357600009OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-83640DiVA: diva2:676144
Funder
Swedish Research Council
Available from: 2013-12-05 Created: 2013-12-03 Last updated: 2017-12-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1957 kB)51 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1957 kBChecksum SHA-512
053c5feb8d5a6685f2b6c180eb7a77940fd358ef583b55aed742d2f95ab65e6800cf0b3dc7a39d480a3912bc1c4be2ba4245caf837d0a2b1acec91e208709ff3
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Peolsson, Michael
By organisation
Department of Chemistry
In the same journal
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 51 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 49 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf