umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Making visible the big C: bringing colonisation into the frame of indigenous population research
University of Waikato.
Umeå University, Faculty of Arts, Centre for Sami Research. (Arcum)
2013 (English)In: TASA Conference 2013, 2013Conference paper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Despite a growing recognition of the need to account for the profound effects of colonisation in contemporary explanations of Indigenous health and wellbeing (Durie, 2003; Gracey & King, 2009), explanatory approaches that actually do so are relatively rare. Focusing on North America, Australasia and Scandinavia, this paper provides a comprehensive critical review of how the relationship between colonization, health and wellbeing has been framed in population and health research. Particular attention is given to the theorised mechanisms, both implicit and explicit, linking colonisation to Indigenous outcomes at specific historical junctures. The review is part of a pioneering international, interdisciplinary project that seeks to understand the drivers and mechanisms linking colonisation and health for Australian Aborigines, Māori and Swedish Sami. The three case studies offer a fruitful basis for comparison. Sami have among the best health outcomes in the world, with no discernable difference with the non-Sami population. By contrast, Australian Aboriginals have health outcomes that rank among the worst in the developed world, while Māori appear to occupy an intermediate position. In addition to variation in health outcomes (both in an absolute sense and vis-à-vis the settler majority), all three peoples have had quite different experiences of colonisation with respect to the loss of political authority, industrialization, land alienation, language suppression, cultural assimilation, racialization and so forth. A key question animating this study is the extent to which differences in the colonisation experience can explain differences in the health outcomes of Indigenous peoples in those countries.

Durie, M. (2003). The health of Indigenous peoples: Depends on genetics, politics, and socioeconomic factors, BMJ: British Medical Journal, 326(7388), 510-511.

Gracey, M. & King, M. (2009). Indigenous health part I: Determinants and disease patterns, Lancet, 374, 64-75.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013.
Keyword [en]
Colonisation, Colonialism, Indigenous health
National Category
Other Medical Sciences not elsewhere specified
Research subject
Medical Humanities; Public health
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-84003OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-84003DiVA: diva2:678561
Conference
TASA Conference 2013: Reflections, Intersections and Aspirations 50 years of Australian Sociology
Projects
Wallenberg Academy FellowHealth in Transition - a Longitudinal Study of Colonization, State and the Health of Indigenous Peoples in Sweden, Australia and New Zealand, 1850-2000.
Funder
Swedish Research Council, 2012-5490Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
Available from: 2013-12-12 Created: 2013-12-12 Last updated: 2016-05-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Axelsson, Per
By organisation
Centre for Sami Research
Other Medical Sciences not elsewhere specified

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 326 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf