Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Using non-linear decomposition to explain the discriminatory effects of male-female differentials in access to care: a cardiac rehabilitation case study
Research Centre for Gender, Health and Ageing and Hunter Medical Research Institute, University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
2009 (English)In: Social Science and Medicine, ISSN 0277-9536, E-ISSN 1873-5347, Vol. 69, no 7, 1072-1079 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This paper demonstrates the use of non-linear decomposition for identifying discrimination in referral to a cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program. The application is important because the methods are not commonly applied in this context. A secondary data analysis was conducted on a cohort of 2375 patients eligible for referral (as defined) to an Australian hospital outpatient CR program (1 July 1996 to 31 December 2000) on the basis of inpatient discharge diagnosis codes. Data from a population-based disease register were linked to hospital inpatient statistics and CR program records. Cohort selection was established in accordance with first register recorded hospital separations having specified cardiac inpatient diagnoses for which CR was recommended. Using the existing literature as a guide, multivariate logistic regression methods tested the strength of statistical association between independent variables (or 'endowments') and CR referral. Compared with males, females had 40% fewer odds of being referred. Non-linear decomposition was performed as a post-logistic regression technique to show the extent to which the sex-based inequality in referral (as defined here) was due to group characteristics (the relative distribution of endowments) compared with other influences not adjusted for in the model. The results showed that approximately 18% of the male-female inequality in referral was not explained by group characteristics, and on this basis was 'discriminatory'. The extent to which individual endowments contributed to the explained part of the inequality was also of interest. The methods offer potentially useful tools for informing researchers, policy makers, clinicians and others about unfair discriminatory processes that influence access to health and social services.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2009. Vol. 69, no 7, 1072-1079 p.
National Category
Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-85125DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.07.012PubMedID: 19692164OAI: diva2:691646
Available from: 2014-01-28 Created: 2014-01-28 Last updated: 2014-02-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Stewart Williams, Jennifer Anne
In the same journal
Social Science and Medicine
Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 30 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link