Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Who benefits from university admissions tests?: a comparison between grades and test scores as selection instruments to higher education
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Umeå School of Business and Economics (USBE), Economics.
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of applied educational science, Departement of Educational Measurement.
2014 (English)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

In Sweden, there are two separate instruments for ranking applicants in the admission to higher education; the GPA from upper secondary school and the Swedish Scholastic Assessment Test (the SweSAT). A problem in the selection is that different groups of students perform differently on the instruments. Also, while the GPA is regarded more valid but with reliability problems, the test is seen as reliable but with lower predictive validity. Hence, in 2011, the test was revised, with the purpose to increase its relevance for university studies. New item types and new subtests were introduced, and the weights of the verbal and quantitative parts of the test were made more balanced. This study compares how students are ranked on the basis of the new test compared to their GPA, to find out if previous group differences still remain. The data consists of test participants in the autumn of 2011 and spring of 2012 at the ages 17 to 25. The results show that the correlation between test scores and GPA is approximately the same as before the revision. It is also found that there are still group differences in terms of boys performing better on the test and girls on the GPA. However, when studying separate sub-tests and grades and national course tests from isolated subjects, the students seem to be ranked more similarly than in the overall SweSAT-GPA comparison. Although students with a non-Swedish background are performing lower than other students on both instruments, boys in this group seem to be graded more leniently than the girls with a similar background in mathematics, and the opposite is the case in verbal subjects.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Umeå, 2014. , 49 p.
Umeå economic studies, ISSN 0348-1018 ; 874
National Category
Social Sciences
Research subject
didactics of educational measurement; Economics
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-86120OAI: diva2:697384
Available from: 2014-02-18 Created: 2014-02-18 Last updated: 2014-02-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

UES874(383 kB)264 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 383 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wikström, MagnusWikström, Christina
By organisation
EconomicsDepartement of Educational Measurement
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 264 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 688 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link