umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The influence of health-risk perception and distress on reactions to low-level chemical exposure
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology.
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology.
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology.
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology.
Show others and affiliations
2013 (English)In: Frontiers in Psychology, ISSN 1664-1078, E-ISSN 1664-1078, Vol. 4, 816- p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The general aim of the current study was to investigate how perceived health risk of a chemical exposure and self-reported distress are related to perceived odor intensity and odor valence, symptoms, cognitive performance over time as well as reactions to blank exposure. Based on ratings of general distress, 20 participants constituted a relatively low distress group, and 20 other participants a relatively high distress group. Health risk perception was manipulated by providing positively and negatively biased information regarding n-butanol. Participants made repeated ratings of intensity, valence and symptoms and performed cognitive tasks while exposed to 4.7 ppm n-butanol for 60 min (first 10 min were blank exposure) inside an exposure chamber. Ratings by the positive and negative bias groups suggest that the manipulation influenced perceived health risk of the exposure. The high distress group did not habituate to the exposure in terms of intensity when receiving negative information, but did so when receiving positive information. The high distress group, compared with the low distress group, rated the exposure as significantly more unpleasant, reported greater symptoms and performed worse on a cognitively demanding task over time. The positive bias group and high distress group rated blank exposure as more intense. The main findings suggest that relatively distressed individuals are negatively affected by exposures to a greater degree than non-distressed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. Vol. 4, 816- p.
Keyword [en]
health-risk perception, olfaction, environmental psychology, perception, sensitization, bias, distress, cognition
National Category
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-86312DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00816ISI: 000331579100001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-86312DiVA: diva2:698488
Available from: 2014-02-22 Created: 2014-02-22 Last updated: 2017-12-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2039 kB)261 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2039 kBChecksum SHA-512
426893a5d027ed095bd12798c8031ea39d19b8d6a42d008a4cc5d45975fc96ff2e3cfa6d237e9e8ad10bb7df3d127736386bb548e167b472c1a77b9a2010e05b
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Andersson, LinusClaeson, Anna-SaraLedin, LisaWisting, FridaNordin, Steven
By organisation
Department of Psychology
In the same journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 261 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 366 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf