umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Cancer staging and survival in colon cancer is dependent on the quality of the pathologists' specimen examination.
The Department of Surgical Sciences, Akademiska sjukhuset, Colorectal Unit, Uppsala University, SE 751 85, Uppsala, Sweden.
The Department of Surgical Sciences, Akademiska sjukhuset, Colorectal Unit, Uppsala University, SE 751 85, Uppsala, Sweden.
Department of Oncology, Radiology and Clinical Immunology, Akademiska sjukhuset, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
The Department of Surgical Sciences, Akademiska sjukhuset, Colorectal Unit, Uppsala University, SE 751 85, Uppsala, Sweden.
2005 (English)In: European Journal of Cancer, ISSN 0959-8049, E-ISSN 1879-0852, Vol. 41, no 14, 2071-2078 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Correct staging of colon cancer is decisive regarding further oncological treatment, surveillance and prediction of long-term survival. This study investigated the variability in accuracy of pathology reports with focus on differences between pathology departments and their compliance to regional guidelines. Data from the colon cancer register (1997-2002) of the Uppsala/Orebro, Sweden, health care region were analysed and the seven pathology departments in this region were compared. Included were 3735 patients who had undergone resection of a colon cancer. Cumulative 5-year survival was the main end-point. For 64% (n = 2390) of the cases, the number of lymph nodes examined was given (median 8). Survival in stage II was lower when fewer than 12 nodes were examined or when the number of nodes sampled was not given (P = 0.001, log-rank test). In stage III, those with at the most 3 nodes positive (N1) had a better survival than those with 4 or more nodes positive (N2) (P < 0.001, log-rank test). An index of metastases (IM), derived from the number of nodes with metastases divided by the number of nodes examined, was calculated for stage III tumours. Examination of 12 nodes is necessary to assure stage III cases with the median IM (0.32), whereas 20 nodes are necessary to assure 90% of cases with the lower quartile of IM (0.16). Irrespective of the number of nodes investigated, overall survival was better among patients with IM < 0.33 vs. IM > or = 33 (P < 0.001, log-rank test). The prognostic information of the IM was higher than that of the N-stage. Quality of a pathology department, measured by the median number of lymph nodes investigated and by the proportion of reports where the number is given, was determined to indicate correct staging and management of the patient. An index of metastases (IM) is a possible basis for guidance in the choice of adjuvant treatments that appears superior to that of N-stage.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2005. Vol. 41, no 14, 2071-2078 p.
National Category
Cancer and Oncology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-86437DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.06.012PubMedID: 16125926OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-86437DiVA: diva2:699094
Available from: 2014-02-26 Created: 2014-02-26 Last updated: 2017-12-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Gunnarsson, Ulf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gunnarsson, Ulf
In the same journal
European Journal of Cancer
Cancer and Oncology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 27 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf