Reception of integrative and complementary medicine (ICM) in scientific journals: a citation and co-word analysis
2014 (English)In: Scientometrics, ISSN 0890-3670, E-ISSN 1588-2861, Vol. 98, no 2, 807-821 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Even if integrative and complementary medicine (ICM) is a growing scientific field, it is also a highly contested area in terms of scientific legitimacy. The aim of this article is to analyze the reception of ICM research in scientific journals. Is this kind of research acknowledged outside the ICM context, for example, in general or specialized medicine? What is the impact of ICM research? and Is it possible to identify any shift in content, from the original ICM research to the documents where it is acknowledged? The material consisted of two sets: documents published in 12 ICM journals in 2007; and all documents citing these documents during the years 2007-2012. These sets were analyzed with help from citation and co-word analysis. When analyzing the citation pattern, it was clear that a majority of the cited documents were acknowledged in journals and documents that could be related to research areas outside the ICM context, such as pharmacology & pharmacy and plant science-even if the most frequent singular journals and subject categories were connected to ICM. However, after analyzing the content of cited and citing documents, it was striking how similar the content was. It was also evident that much of this research was related to basic preclinical research, in fields such as cell biology, plant pharmacology, and animal experiments.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. Vol. 98, no 2, 807-821 p.
Integrative medicine, Complementary medicine, Science studies, Co-word analysis, Citation analysis
IdentifiersURN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-86836DOI: 10.1007/s11192-013-1082-9ISI: 000330622600003OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-86836DiVA: diva2:704937