Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Systematic review of return to work after mild traumatic brain injury: results of the international collaboration on mild traumatic brain injury prognosis
Show others and affiliations
2014 (English)In: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, ISSN 0003-9993, E-ISSN 1532-821X, Vol. 95, no 3, Suppl, S201-S209 p.Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]


To synthesize the best available evidence on return to work (RTW) after mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI).

Data Sources

MEDLINE and other databases were searched (2001–2012) with terms including “craniocerebral trauma” and “employment.” Reference lists of eligible articles were also searched.

Study Selection

Controlled trials and cohort and case-control studies were selected according to predefined criteria. Studies had to assess RTW or employment outcomes in at least 30 MTBI cases.

Data Extraction

Eligible studies were critically appraised using a modification of the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria. Two reviewers independently reviewed and extracted data from accepted studies into evidence tables.

Data Synthesis

Evidence was synthesized qualitatively according to modified Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria and prioritized according to design as exploratory or confirmatory. After 77,914 records were screened, 299 articles were found eligible and reviewed; 101 (34%) of these with a low risk of bias were accepted as scientifically admissible, and 4 of these had RTW or employment outcomes. This evidence is preliminary and suggests that most workers RTW within 3 to 6 months after MTBI; MTBI is not a significant risk factor for long-term work disability; and predictors of delayed RTW include a lower level of education (<11y of formal education), nausea or vomiting on hospital admission, extracranial injuries, severe head/bodily pain early after injury, and limited job independence and decision-making latitude.


Our findings are based on preliminary evidence with varied patient characteristics and MTBI definitions, thus limiting firm conclusions. More well-designed studies are required to understand RTW and sustained employment after MTBI in the longer term (≥2y post-MTBI).

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2014. Vol. 95, no 3, Suppl, S201-S209 p.
Keyword [en]
Craniocerebral trauma, Employment, Rehabilitation, Work
National Category
Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-87849DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.10.010OAI: diva2:712051
Available from: 2014-04-13 Created: 2014-04-13 Last updated: 2014-04-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Stålnacke, Britt-Marie
By organisation
Rehabilitation Medicine
In the same journal
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 65 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link