umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Protection against varicella with two doses of combined measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccine versus one dose of monovalent varicella vaccine: a multicentre, observer-blind, randomised, controlled trial
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Paediatrics.
Show others and affiliations
2014 (English)In: The Lancet, ISSN 0140-6736, E-ISSN 1474-547X, Vol. 383, no 9925, 1313-1324 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background Rates of varicella have decreased substantially in countries implementing routine varicella vaccination. Immunisation is possible with monovalent varicella vaccine or a combined measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccine (MMRV). We assessed protection against varicella in naive children administered one dose of varicella vaccine or two doses of MMRV. Methods This study was done in ten European countries with endemic varicella. Healthy children aged 12-22 months were randomised (3: 3: 1 ratio, by computer-generated randomisation list, with block size seven) to receive 42 days apart (1) two doses of MMRV (MMRV group), or (2) MMR at dose one and monovalent varicella vaccine at dose two (MMR+V group), or (3) two doses of MMR (MMR group; control). Participants and their parents or guardians, individuals involved in assessment of any outcome, and sponsor staff involved in review or analysis of data were masked to treatment assignment. The primary efficacy endpoint was occurrence of confirmed varicella (by detection of varicella zoster virus DNA or epidemiological link) from 42 days after the second vaccine dose to the end of the first phase of the trial. Cases were graded for severity. Efficacy analyses were per protocol. Safety analyses included all participants who received at least one vaccine dose. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00226499. Findings Between Sept 1, 2005, and May 10, 2006, 5803 children (mean age 14.2 months, SD 2.5) were vaccinated. In the efficacy cohort of 5285 children, the mean duration of follow-up in the MMRV group was 36 months (SD 8.8), in the MMR+V group was 36 months (8.5) and in the MMR group was 35 months (8.9). Varicella cases were confirmed for 37 participants in the MMRV group (two moderate to severe), 243 in the MMR+V group, and 201 in the MMR group. Second cases occurred for three participants (all in the MMR+V group). Varicella cases were moderate to severe for two participants in the MMRV group, 37 in the MMR+V group (one being a second case that followed a mild first case); and 117 in the MMR group. Efficacy of two-dose MMRV against all varicella was 94.9% (97.5% CI 92.4-96.6), and against moderate to severe varicella was 99.5% (97.5-99.9). Efficacy of one-dose varicella vaccine against all varicella was 65.4% (57.2-72.1), and against moderate to severe varicella (post hoc) was 90.7% (85.9-93.9). The most common adverse event in all groups was injection-site redness (up to 25% of participants). Within 15 days after dose one, 57.4% (95% CI 53.9-60.9) of participants in the MMRV group reported fever of 38 degrees C or more, by contrast with 44.5% (41.0-48.1) with MMR+V, and 39.8% (33.8-46.1) with MMR. Eight serious adverse events were deemed related to vaccination (three MMRV, four MMR+V, one MMR). All resolved within the study period. Interpretation These results support the implementation of two-dose varicella vaccination on a short course, to ensure optimum protection from all forms of varicella disease.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. Vol. 383, no 9925, 1313-1324 p.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-88383DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61461-5ISI: 000334104900030OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-88383DiVA: diva2:719916
Available from: 2014-05-27 Created: 2014-05-05 Last updated: 2017-12-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Gothefors, Leif

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gothefors, Leif
By organisation
Paediatrics
In the same journal
The Lancet
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 83 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf