umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
‘What’s in a name?’ ‘No more than when it's mine own’. Evidence from auditory oddball distraction.
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology. School of Psychology, Cardiff University, UK.
Department of Psychology, University of the Balearic Islands, Spain and School of Psychology, University of Western Australia, Australia.
School of Psychology, Cardiff University, UK and School of Psychology, University of Western Australia, Australia.
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology.
Show others and affiliations
2014 (English)In: Acta Psychologica, ISSN 0001-6918, E-ISSN 1873-6297, Vol. 150, 161-166 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Research of the distractor value of hearing the own name has shown that this self-referring stimulus captures attention in an involuntary fashion and create distraction. The behavioral studies are few and the outcomes are not always clear cut. In this study the distraction by own name compared to a control name was investigated by using a cross-modal oddball task in two experiments. In the first experiment, thirty-nine participants were conducting a computerized categorization task while exposed to, to-be ignored own and matched control names (controlling for familiarity, gender and number of syllables) as unexpected auditory deviant stimulus (12.5% trials for each name category) and a sine wave tone as a standard stimulus (75% of the trials). In the second experiment, another group of thirty-nine participants completed the same task but with the additional deviant stimulus of an irrelevant word added (10% trials for each deviant type and 70% trials with the standard stimulus). Results showed deviant distracton by exposure to both the irrelevant word, own and the control name compared to the standard tone but no differences were found showing that the own name captured attention and distracted the participants more than an irrelevant word or a control name. The results elucidate the role of the own name as a potent auditory distractor and possible limitations with its theoretical significance for general theories of attention are discussed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2014. Vol. 150, 161-166 p.
Keyword [en]
Oddball; Distraction; Own-name; Attention; Auditory
National Category
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-89535DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.05.009ISI: 000338811400021OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-89535DiVA: diva2:721449
Available from: 2014-06-04 Created: 2014-06-04 Last updated: 2017-12-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ljungberg, Jessica KMarsja, ErikNeely, Gregory
By organisation
Department of Psychology
In the same journal
Acta Psychologica
Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 141 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf