umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Oral Appliance Treatment for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: An Update
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Odontology.
Show others and affiliations
2014 (English)In: Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine (JCSM), ISSN 1550-9389, E-ISSN 1550-9397, Vol. 10, no 2, 215-227 p.Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Oral appliances (OA) have emerged as an alternative to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) treatment. The most commonly used OA reduces upper airway collapse by advancing the mandible (OA(m)). There is a strong evidence base demonstrating OA m improve OSA in the majority of patients, including some with more severe disease. However OA(m) are not efficacious for all, with approximately one-third of patients experiencing no therapeutic benefit. OA(m) are generally well tolerated, although short-term adverse effects during acclimatization are common. Long-term dental changes do occur, but these are for the most part subclinical and do not preclude continued use. Patients often prefer OA(m) to gold-standard CPAP treatment. Head-to-head trials confirm CPAP is superior in reducing OSA parameters on polysomnography; however, this greater efficacy does not necessarily translate into better health outcomes in clinical practice. Comparable effectiveness of OA(m) and CPAP has been attributed to higher reported nightly use of OA(m), suggesting that inferiority in reducing apneic events may be counteracted by greater treatment adherence. Recently, significant advances in commercially available OA(m) technologies have been made. Remotely controlled mandibular positioners have the potential to identify treatment responders and the level of therapeutic advancement required in single night titration polysomnography. Objective monitoring of OA(m) adherence using small embedded temperature sensing data loggers is now available and will enhance clinical practice and research. These technologies will further enhance efficacy and effectiveness of OA(m) treatment for OSA.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. Vol. 10, no 2, 215-227 p.
Keyword [en]
Obstructive sleep apnea, oral appliance, mandibular advancement, adherence, effectiveness
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-90877DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.3460ISI: 000336494300015OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-90877DiVA: diva2:732262
Available from: 2014-07-03 Created: 2014-07-01 Last updated: 2017-12-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Marklund, Marie
By organisation
Department of Odontology
In the same journal
Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine (JCSM)
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 622 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf