umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Crowdsourcing Knowledge: Interdiscursive flows from Wikipedia into scholarly research
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Sociology.
2014 (English)In: Culture Unbound. Journal of Current Cultural Research, ISSN 2000-1525, E-ISSN 2000-1525, Vol. 6, 609-627 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Information increasingly flows from smart online knowledge systems, based on ‘collective intelligence’, and to the more traditional form of knowledge production that takes place within academia. Looking specifically at the case of Wikipedia, and at how it is employed in scholarly research, this study contributes new knowledge about the potential role of user-generated information in science and innovation. This is done using a dataset collected from the Scopus research database, which is processed with a combination of bibliometric techniques and qualitative analysis. Results show that there has been a significant increase in the use of Wikipedia as a reference within all areas of science and scholarship.Wikipedia is used to a larger extent within areas like Computer Science, Mathematics, Social Sciences and Arts and Humanities, than in Natural Sciences, Medicine and Psychology. Wikipedia is used as a source for a variety of knowledge and information as a replacement for traditional reference works. A thematic qualitative analysis showed that Wikipediaknowledge is recontextualised in different ways when it is incorporated into scholarly discourse. In general, one can identify two forms of framing where one is unmodalised, and the other is modalised. The unmodalised uses include referring to Wikipedia as a complement or example, as a repository, and as an unproblematic source of information. The modalised use is characterised by the invocation of various markers that emphasise – in different ways – thatWikipedia can not be automatically trusted. It has not yet achieved full legitimacy as a source.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. Vol. 6, 609-627 p.
Keyword [en]
Wikipedia, collective intelligence, academia, encyclopaedias, citations
National Category
Sociology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-91575DOI: 10.3384/cu.2000.1525.146609OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-91575DiVA: diva2:737036
Available from: 2014-08-11 Created: 2014-08-11 Last updated: 2017-12-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(494 kB)176 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 494 kBChecksum SHA-512
bbab1b10bf64869c0c531946dd15f4abe5fedd06c8de4ac0751099f4cb5abdf17f64a6f72b5327c9778da0293907551a7a3b07888ee7e82e34c230188a9693b6
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lindgren, Simon
By organisation
Department of Sociology
In the same journal
Culture Unbound. Journal of Current Cultural Research
Sociology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 176 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 635 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf