Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
The circular stapling device as a risk factor for anastomotic leakage.
Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2004 (English)In: Colorectal Disease, ISSN 1462-8910, E-ISSN 1463-1318, Vol. 6, no 4, 275-9 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

AIM: To investigate the relation between the type of circular stapler and anastomotic leak in rectal cancer surgery.

BACKGROUND: During the past decades results from rectal cancer surgery have improved considerably regarding risk of local recurrence and survival. Two main paradigm changes are considered to be the cause for this: the introduction of total mesorectal excision (TME) and the increasing use of radiotherapy. However, rectal cancer surgery is associated with an unacceptably high frequency of complications of which anastomotic leak is one of the most severe ones. The hypothesis was raised that the choice of stapler influenced the leakage rates.

METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to all departments of surgery (n = 66) performing rectal cancer surgery in Sweden to determine the choice of circular stapler when performing anterior resection for rectal cancer. These data were linked to the Swedish Rectal Cancer Registry for the period 1995-99.

RESULTS: A total of 3316 patients had an anterior resection. The choice of circular stapling device was determined in 70% of the cases. When stapler A was used, the leakage rate was 11% whereas it was 7% when stapler B was used (P = 0.0039). In the cases where it was impossible to determine which stapler had been used the leakage rate was 8%.

CONCLUSION: Quality control is an important part of medicine and the present study suggests that it also must include surgical instruments. A prospective randomised study is needed to confirm the results.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2004. Vol. 6, no 4, 275-9 p.
Keyword [en]
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Anastomosis, Surgical/instrumentation, Colectomy/adverse effects/*instrumentation, Female, Humans, Male, Rectal Neoplasms/*surgery, *Registries, Quality of Health Care, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Surgical Staplers/*adverse effects, Surgical Wound Dehiscence/*etiology, Sweden
National Category
Surgery Gastroenterology and Hepatology
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-91654DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2004.00625.xPubMedID: 15206973OAI: diva2:737595
Available from: 2014-08-13 Created: 2014-08-13 Last updated: 2014-08-13

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gunnarsson, Ulf
In the same journal
Colorectal Disease
SurgeryGastroenterology and Hepatology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 10 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link