umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Writers blocked: on the wrongs of research co-authorship and some possible strategies for improvement
Umeå University, Faculty of Arts, Department of historical, philosophical and religious studies. Department of Philosophy, Linguistics and Theory of Science, Göteborgs Universitet, Göteborg, Sweden.
Basel, Switzerland; Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
2015 (English)In: Science and Engineering Ethics, ISSN 1353-3452, E-ISSN 1471-5546, Vol. 21, no 5, 1315-1329 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The various problems associated with co-authorship of research articles have attracted much attention in recent years. We believe that this (hopefully) growing awareness is a very welcome development. However, we will argue that the particular and increasing importance of authorship and the harmful implications of current practices of research authorship for junior researchers have not been emphasised enough. We will use the case of our own research area (bioethics) to illustrate some of the pitfalls of current publishing practices – in particular, the impact on the evaluation of one’s work in the area of employment or funding. Even where there are explicit guidelines, they are often disregarded. This disregard, which is often exemplified through the inflation of co-authorship in some research areas, may seem benign to some of us; but it is not. Attribution of co-authorship for reasons other than merit in relation to the publication misrepresents the work towards that publication, and generates unfair competition. We make a case for increasing awareness, for transparency and for more explicit guidelines and regulation of research co-authorship within and across research areas. We examine some of the most sensitive areas of concern and their implications for researchers, particularly junior ones, and we suggest several strategies for future action.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Netherlands, 2015. Vol. 21, no 5, 1315-1329 p.
Keyword [en]
publication ethics, ethics of co-authorship, research authorship, bioethics, philosophy, guest authorship, research mentoring, fairness in research, competition in research
National Category
Ethics Medical Ethics Philosophy
Research subject
Ethics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-94883DOI: 10.1007/s11948-014-9606-0ISI: 000361456000013PubMedID: 25348894OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-94883DiVA: diva2:756749
Available from: 2014-10-19 Created: 2014-10-19 Last updated: 2017-12-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Cutas, Daniela

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Cutas, Daniela
By organisation
Department of historical, philosophical and religious studies
In the same journal
Science and Engineering Ethics
EthicsMedical EthicsPhilosophy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 122 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf