Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
'Ultrasound is an invaluable third eye, but it can't see everything': a qualitative study with obstetricians in Australia
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Judith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia .
Judith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia .
School of Health and Social Studies, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden .
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynaecology.
Show others and affiliations
2014 (English)In: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, ISSN 1471-2393, Vol. 14, 363- p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Obstetric ultrasound has come to play a significant role in obstetrics since its introduction in clinical care. Today, most pregnant women in the developed world are exposed to obstetric ultrasound examinations, and there is no doubt that the advantages of obstetric ultrasound technique have led to improvements in pregnancy outcomes. However, at the same time, the increasing use has also raised many ethical challenges. This study aimed to explore obstetricians' experiences of the significance of obstetric ultrasound for clinical management of complicated pregnancy and their perceptions of expectant parents' experiences. METHODS: A qualitative study was undertaken in November 2012 as part of the CROss-Country Ultrasound Study (CROCUS). Semi-structured individual interviews were held with 14 obstetricians working at two large hospitals in Victoria, Australia. Transcribed data underwent qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: An overall theme emerged during the analyses, 'Obstetric ultrasound - a third eye', reflecting the significance and meaning of ultrasound in pregnancy, and the importance of the additional information that ultrasound offers clinicians managing the surveillance of a pregnant woman and her fetus. This theme was built on four categories: I:'Everyday-tool' for pregnancy surveillance, II: Significance for managing complicated pregnancy, III: Differing perspectives on obstetric ultrasound, and IV: Counselling as a balancing act. In summary, the obstetricians viewed obstetric ultrasound as an invaluable tool in their everyday practice. More importantly however, the findings emphasise some of the clinical dilemmas that occur due to its use: the obstetricians' and expectant parents' differing perspectives and expectations of obstetric ultrasound examinations, the challenges of uncertain ultrasound findings, and how this information was conveyed and balanced by obstetricians in counselling expectant parents. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights a range of previously rarely acknowledged clinical dilemmas that obstetricians face in relation to the use of obstetric ultrasound. Despite being a tool of considerable significance in the surveillance of pregnancy, there are limitations and uncertainties that arise with its use that make counselling expectant parents challenging. Research is needed which further investigates the effects and experiences of the continuing worldwide rapid technical advances in surveillance of pregnancies.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central, 2014. Vol. 14, 363- p.
Keyword [en]
Australia, clinical experiences, clinical management, counselling, obstetric ultrasound, obstetricians, obstetrics, perspectives, pregnancy complications, qualitative study
National Category
Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-97233DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-363ISI: 000344502900001PubMedID: 25336335OAI: diva2:773206
Available from: 2014-12-18 Created: 2014-12-12 Last updated: 2015-05-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(347 kB)128 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 347 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Edvardsson, KristinaPersson, MargaretaLalos, AnnMogren, Ingrid
By organisation
Obstetrics and Gynaecology
In the same journal
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 128 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 88 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link