Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Use of Two-Part Regression Calibration Model to Correct for Measurement Error in Episodically Consumed Foods in a Single-Replicate Study Design: EPIC Case Study
Show others and affiliations
2014 (English)In: PLoS ONE, ISSN 1932-6203, Vol. 9, no 11, e113160- p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In epidemiologic studies, measurement error in dietary variables often attenuates association between dietary intake and disease occurrence. To adjust for the attenuation caused by error in dietary intake, regression calibration is commonly used. To apply regression calibration, unbiased reference measurements are required. Short-term reference measurements for foods that are not consumed daily contain excess zeroes that pose challenges in the calibration model. We adapted twopart regression calibration model, initially developed for multiple replicates of reference measurements per individual to a single-replicate setting. We showed how to handle excess zero reference measurements by two-step modeling approach, how to explore heteroscedasticity in the consumed amount with variance-mean graph, how to explore nonlinearity with the generalized additive modeling (GAM) and the empirical logit approaches, and how to select covariates in the calibration model. The performance of two-part calibration model was compared with the one-part counterpart. We used vegetable intake and mortality data from European Prospective Investigation on Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study. In the EPIC, reference measurements were taken with 24-hour recalls. For each of the three vegetable subgroups assessed separately, correcting for error with an appropriately specified two-part calibration model resulted in about three fold increase in the strength of association with all-cause mortality, as measured by the log hazard ratio. Further found is that the standard way of including covariates in the calibration model can lead to over fitting the two-part calibration model. Moreover, the extent of adjusting for error is influenced by the number and forms of covariates in the calibration model. For episodically consumed foods, we advise researchers to pay special attention to response distribution, nonlinearity, and covariate inclusion in specifying the calibration model.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. Vol. 9, no 11, e113160- p.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-98569DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113160ISI: 000345158700122PubMedID: 25402487OAI: diva2:783838
Available from: 2015-01-27 Created: 2015-01-23 Last updated: 2015-01-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(498 kB)69 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 498 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Johansson, Ingegerd
By organisation
Department of Odontology
In the same journal
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 69 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 84 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link