umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Skin symptoms among VDT workers and electromagnetic-fields: a case-referent study
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Environmental Medicine. National Institute for Occupational Health, Umeå, Sweden.
National Institute of Occupational Health, Umeå, Sweden.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Epidemiology and Public Health Sciences. Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Dermatology and Venerology.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Epidemiology and Public Health Sciences.
1995 (English)In: Indoor Air, ISSN 0905-6947, E-ISSN 1600-0668, Vol. 5, no 1, 29-37 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Th is case referent study is a part of the Office illness Project in Northern Sweden. From a questionnaire study among 5986 office workers, 75 VDT workers with self-reported facial skin symptoms and the same number of referents were selected for this study. The environmental electric and magnetic fields in the office as well as electromagnetic fields associated with the VDT at the workplace were measured, The aim of this part of the project was to explore the role of the measured electromagnetic parameters in relation to skin symptoms. For most of the measured parameters there was no difference between cases and referents. However, more cases than referents were found in the highest exposure group for two of the measured parameters. Fm the background electric field in the mom the relative risk in terms of crude odds ratio (OR) was 3.0 (95% CI: 1.2-7.2) for the high exposed group (greater than or equal to 31 V/m) compared with the lowest group (less than or equal to 10 V/m). The same comparison for the magnetic field in the ELF-range (greater than or equal to 0.30 mu T vs less than or equal to 0.145 mu T) in front of the VDT gave an OR of 2.7(95% CI: 1.0-6.9).

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 1995. Vol. 5, no 1, 29-37 p.
Keyword [en]
VDT-workers, skin symptoms, electric, magnetic fields
National Category
Environmental Health and Occupational Health
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-99019DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.1995.t01-3-00005.xISI: A1995QY68600005OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-99019DiVA: diva2:785257
Projects
digitalisering@umu
Available from: 2015-02-02 Created: 2015-02-02 Last updated: 2017-12-05Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Office work and physical factors: health aspects of electromagnetic fields and light
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Office work and physical factors: health aspects of electromagnetic fields and light
1997 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The overall aim of this thesis is to increase our knowledge of the physical environment of office workers with special focus on electromagnetic fields and to address the question of whether electromagnetic fields can directly or indirectly contribute to symptoms or discomfort among video display terminal ( VDT) workers. Furthermore, we have measured light modulation from various commonly used light sources in laboratory conditions and, as a second step, used modulated light as stimulus for provocation of neurophysiological responses in persons with perceived “electrical hypersensitivity” (EHS).During the last 20 years work-related illness among office workers has received increased attention. Changes in the physical environment, the introduction of VDTs and other electrical equipment and changes in light conditions have been discussed in this context. The basis for this thesis is the interdisciplinary Office Illness Project in Northern Sweden. Using a questionnaire completed by 4,943 office workers, 150 VDT workers with or without facial skin symptoms were selected for a case referent study of the electromagnetic fields in offices.When the measurements in the offices were performed in 1989, the general level of the 50 Hz magnetic fields in the offices was rather low, but in 5% of the offices the flux density exceeded 0.5 pT. At this level VDT monitors were shown to display detectable instability (jitter). Furthermore, the ability of test subjects (healthy volunteers) to detect jitter was shown to depend on both the amplitude and frequency characteristics of this instability. The study indicates that the instability of computer monitors and thereby the instability of the visual image of the VDT screen might be an increasing problem since it is known that the harmonic content of the general magnetic field in offices is on the rise.VDT monitors contributed to the magnetic field level at VDT workplaces in both extremely low and very low frequency ranges. However, the dominant source of electric fields in rooms was ungrounded electrical equipment, not VDT screens.High electric fields in the extremely low frequency range in the offices were associated with skin symptoms among VDT workers. The causal nature of this association cannot be determined since it may depend on undetected factors related to exposure. No associations were found, however, for any of the VDT-related electromagnetic fields and skin symptoms.Commonly used fluorescent tubes in our office environment have a degree of modulation of the light (flicker) that varies widely from less than 1% (fluorescent tubes with high frequency gear) up to nearly 100%. When persons with perceived EHS were exposed to flickering light, a higher amplitude of brain cortex responses were found at all tested frequencies compared with control subjects. These findings are of considerable interest, but further studies are required in order to establish a possible relationship between flickering light and discomfort/symptoms in persons with perceived EHS.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Umeå: Umeå universitet och Arbetslivsinstitutet, 1997. 46 p.
Series
Umeå University medical dissertations, ISSN 0346-6612 ; 530
Keyword
Facial skin symptoms, office illness, electrical hypersensitivity, physical environment, flicker, jitter, neurophysiological effects
National Category
Environmental Health and Occupational Health
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-96906 (URN)91-7191-386-6 (ISBN)
Public defence
1997-11-28, Stora föreläsningssalen, Arbetslivsinstitutet, Umeå, Umeå universitet, Umeå, 09:30
Supervisors
Projects
digitalisering@umu
Available from: 2015-02-02 Created: 2014-12-05 Last updated: 2015-04-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Sandström, MonicaHansson Mild, KjellStenberg, BerndtWall, Stig

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sandström, MonicaHansson Mild, KjellStenberg, BerndtWall, Stig
By organisation
Environmental MedicineEpidemiology and Public Health SciencesDermatology and Venerology
In the same journal
Indoor Air
Environmental Health and Occupational Health

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 117 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf