umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Gender differences and the Defense Mechanism Test: A comparative study of adolescents in psychiatric care and healthy controls
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology.
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology.
1998 (English)In: Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, ISSN 0036-5564, E-ISSN 1467-9450, Vol. 39, no 2, 93-99 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The aim of this paper was to study gender differences in the percept-genetic method Defense Mechanism Test (DMT) among a group of 60 adolescent subjects. Three subgroups were used: patients with psychotic disorders (Axis 1); borderline personality disorder (Axis 2) according to the DSM-IV classification system, and a non-patient group. The test protocols were scored with respect to 124 DMT variables and analyzed by means of the multivariate projection method Partial Least Squares (PLS) in latent structures. The overall results showed considerable gender differences in the whole group as well as in the subgroups. The most striking finding was that girls compared to boys were characterized by the perceptual defense identification with the opposite sex, which means that they perceived male gestalts instead of females in the stimulus picture. When both gender and diagnostic group membership were considered simultaneously, the influence of diagnostic group membership seemed to be stronger than gender even if there was an interaction between diagnoses and gender. It was concluded that gender must be considered when the DMT is used on adolescent populations.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 1998. Vol. 39, no 2, 93-99 p.
Keyword [en]
Adolescents, Defense Mechanism Test, multivariate analysis, projective techniques, gender differences
National Category
Applied Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-99199DOI: 10.1111/1467-9450.00061OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-99199DiVA: diva2:786051
Projects
digitalisering@umu
Available from: 2015-02-04 Created: 2015-02-04 Last updated: 2017-12-05Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Defense mechanism test och ungdomar
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Defense mechanism test och ungdomar
1998 (Swedish)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Umeå: Umeå Universitet, 1998. 86 p.
Keyword
Adolescence, Defense Mechanism Test, Projective methods, Multivariate analysis, Defenses, Gender Differences
National Category
Psychiatry Applied Psychology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-96882 (URN)91-7191-476-5 (ISBN)
Public defence
1998-06-11, bt 102, Beteendevetarhuset, Umeå University, Umeå universitet, Umeå, 10:15
Supervisors
Projects
digitalisering@umu
Note

Diss. (sammanfattning) Umeå : Umeå universitet, 1998, Härtill 4 uppsatser.

Available from: 2015-02-04 Created: 2014-12-05 Last updated: 2015-04-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Fransson, PerSundbom, Elisabet
By organisation
Department of Psychology
In the same journal
Scandinavian Journal of Psychology
Applied Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 59 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf