umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Fire and simulated herbivory have antagonistic effects on resistance of savanna grasslands to alien shrub invasion
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences. Community and Conservation Ecology Group, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Scientific Services, South African National Parks, Skukuza, South Africa.
Community and Conservation Ecology Group, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
2015 (English)In: Journal of Vegetation Science, ISSN 1100-9233, E-ISSN 1654-1103, Vol. 26, no 1, p. 114-122Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Question: Resistance of the native community has been identified as an important factor limiting invasion success and invader impact. However, to what extent resistance interacts with disturbance to control invasion success remains unclear. We studied the interaction between biotic resistance, fire and small-scale disturbances mimicking those of large mammalian herbivores (hoof action and grazing) on invasion success of the alien shrub Chromolaena odorata.

Location: Hluhluwe-iMfolozi Park, South Africa.

Methods: We performed a seedling transplant experiment in a savanna grassland. We manipulated the grass layer by clipping (grazing), created small-scale soil disturbances (hoof action) and transplanted seedlings under native tree canopies to assess potential nursing effects. Subsequently, we burned half of our plots. We assessed the effect of fire and small-scale disturbances on seedling growth, survival and biomass allocation.

Results: Seedling survival of C. odorata was 26% in undisturbed savanna grassland, reducing to 5% post-fire. Small-scale disturbances increased seedling biomass and survival and modified biomass allocation, whereas fire greatly reduced seedling survival. Root allocation increased in response to grass clipping, while stem allocation decreased. Tree shading increased seedling survival in the absence of fire, but greatly reduced post-fire survival.

Conclusions: Grass communities in savannas exert a high level of biotic resistance to C. odorata invasion. However, small-scale disturbances, mimicking those of large mammalian herbivores, can facilitate the invasion of C. odorata in savanna grassland both directly, by creating micro-sites for establishment, and indirectly, by reducing the negative effect of fire. Thus, small-scale disturbances may aid the long-term persistence of woody species invading grass-dominated systems.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 26, no 1, p. 114-122
Keyword [en]
Biological invasions, Chromolaena odorata, Competition, Disturbance, Exotic plant, Grazing, vasibility, Non-native, Seedling, Transplant
National Category
Botany
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-98421DOI: 10.1111/jvs.12208ISI: 000345704700013Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84911996304OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-98421DiVA, id: diva2:786056
Available from: 2015-02-04 Created: 2015-01-22 Last updated: 2018-06-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

te Beest, Mariska

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
te Beest, Mariska
By organisation
Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences
In the same journal
Journal of Vegetation Science
Botany

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 96 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf