Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Individual and collective responses to large carnivore management: the roles of trust, representation, knowledge spheres, communication and leadership
Göteborgs universitet.
Lunds tekniska högskola .
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science. (Arcum)
2015 (English)In: Wildlife Biology, ISSN 0909-6396, E-ISSN 1903-220X, Vol. 21, no 3, 175-185 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Overseeing the continued recovery, dispersal and management of large carnivore populations while simultaneously considering human viability and welfare requires delicately balancing local concerns for rural communities’ livelihood prospects and property vulnerability with international concerns for saving threatened species. In this article, we propose an integrated analytical perspective to elucidate how competing interests and power relationships influence the governance and management of contested wildlife resources. However, simply identifying these patterns is not enough. It is also imperative that the interrelationships between broader biophysical, social, political, economic, and cultural contexts and histories be explored in order to describe, analyze and better understand how and why individual and collective responses vary. In doing this, we drew from findings from a variety of social science disciplines (environmental communication, environmental psychology, human ecology, human geography, political science, public administration and social anthropology) and, here, present how social science approaches can enhance understanding of the different layers and contexts of contested natural resource management. Highlighting the individual, socio-cultural, political, and institutional dimensions, the article concludes by identifying five recurrent concepts that must be understood and consciously applied to large carnivore governance and management: i) establishment of trust between people and groups interacting on the subject; ii) fair representation of stakeholder interests; iii) acknowledgement of the different knowledge-spheres, including those based on personal experiences, culture and tradition, and science; iv) communication, based on dialogue about pluralistic perspectives, to collectively formulate and agree on set goals; and v) leadership emphasising empowerment.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 21, no 3, 175-185 p.
Keyword [en]
large carnivores, trust, representation, knowledge spheres, communication, leadership
National Category
Social Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-100506DOI: 10.2981/wlb.00065ISI: 000354319400008OAI: diva2:792372
Available from: 2015-03-03 Created: 2015-03-03 Last updated: 2016-05-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sandström, Camilla
By organisation
Department of Political Science
In the same journal
Wildlife Biology
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 95 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link