umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Effects on sustainable development from large environmental programmes: a review of 16 evaluations
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Sociology. Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of applied educational science, Umeå Centre for Evaluation Research (UCER).
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of applied educational science, Umeå Centre for Evaluation Research (UCER).
2015 (English)In: Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, ISSN 1943-815X, E-ISSN 1943-8168, Vol. 12, no 2, p. 85-105Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The purpose of this article is to develop criteria for meta-evaluation and narrative synthesis of sustainable development (SD) effects from large environmental programmes. First the article develops the criteria and then demonstrates how these can be applied in the case of the Swedish Local Investment Programme targeting SD, through a review of 16 national evaluations. The review shows that the programme’s effects on SD are mixed: it contributed to halting degradation of ecological capital, somewhat to restoring ecological capital, and to increasing human, social, and manufactured capital. However, the programme also had some unintended negative and crowding-out effects on ecological and social capital, and on innovation. A methodological conclusion is that the evaluations lacked some essential information for assessing SD-effects. For example, more than half of the evaluations scored low on intervention effects, a key criterion in the review. Reviews of SD-effects need to compile knowledge from evaluations that use different approaches with varying quality. What is defined as acceptable quality determines if comprehensive conclusions of SD effects can be drawn.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 12, no 2, p. 85-105
Keyword [en]
sustainable development, meta-evaluation, narrative synthesis, environmental programmes, programme effects
National Category
Sociology Political Science Environmental Sciences
Research subject
Sociology; statskunskap
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-100632DOI: 10.1080/1943815X.2014.1001857ISI: 000359855800001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-100632DiVA, id: diva2:792909
Available from: 2015-03-05 Created: 2015-03-05 Last updated: 2018-05-17Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. National environmental evaluation systems: guiding towards sustainability?
Open this publication in new window or tab >>National environmental evaluation systems: guiding towards sustainability?
2018 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Background: Dealing with environmental threats is one of the largest, if not the largest, challenge contemporary societies face. One way to better deal with this challenge would be to produce knowledge that can be used to improve environmental work and environmental policy and thus ultimately contribute to sustainable development. National environmental evaluations, which this thesis explores, could potentially fill this function because they are supposed to generate applicable and useful knowledge for improving environmental policy and practice for a sustainable transition. However, what different environmental actors view as useful knowledge varies, and needs to be empirically investigated. Against this background, the aim of this thesis is to investigate whether, and how, national environmental evaluation systems contribute to key actors’ environmental work and sustainable development. The thesis explores two national environmental evaluation systems in Sweden.

Method: A mixed methods approach is applied that combines three methods. Firstly, a narrative synthesis is developed and applied to compile a list of sustainable development effects from national environmental evaluations. Secondly, a critical program theory is used to investigate the evaluation system’s underlying logic and to assess the likelihood of it achieving its intended effects. Thirdly, a directed content analysis is used to explore the usability and use of environmental evaluations and evaluation systems. The methods are applied to various documents, interviews with key actors, and observations at two environmental seminars.

Results: The results show that, to contribute to sustainable development in the context of evaluation systems and network governance, environmental evaluations need to be of sufficient quality and meet different stakeholders’ knowledge needs. However, only some evaluations meet this demand. The main value of national environmental evaluations and evaluation systems is that they reinforce the national objectives, provide a recurrent report on achievement of objectives, and push actors to take responsibility to improve their environmental work.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Umeå: Umeå Universitet, 2018. p. 71
Series
Akademiska avhandlingar vid Sociologiska institutionen, Umeå universitet, ISSN 1104-2508 ; 80
Keyword
environmental evaluation, evaluation systems, evaluation use, sustainable development, program theory, stakeholders, environmental policy
National Category
Sociology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-147745 (URN)978-91-7601-897-2 (ISBN)
Public defence
2018-06-11, Hörsal E, Humanisthuset, Umeå, 10:15 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2018-05-21 Created: 2018-05-17 Last updated: 2018-05-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Magnus, LarssonHanberger, Anders
By organisation
Department of SociologyUmeå Centre for Evaluation Research (UCER)
In the same journal
Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences
SociologyPolitical ScienceEnvironmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 137 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf