umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Effects on sustainable development from large environmental programmes: a review of 16 evaluations
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Sociology. Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of applied educational science, Umeå Centre for Evaluation Research (UCER).
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of applied educational science, Umeå Centre for Evaluation Research (UCER).
2015 (English)In: Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, ISSN 1943-815X, E-ISSN 1943-8168, Vol. 12, no 2, 85-105 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The purpose of this article is to develop criteria for meta-evaluation and narrative synthesis of sustainable development (SD) effects from large environmental programmes. First the article develops the criteria and then demonstrates how these can be applied in the case of the Swedish Local Investment Programme targeting SD, through a review of 16 national evaluations. The review shows that the programme’s effects on SD are mixed: it contributed to halting degradation of ecological capital, somewhat to restoring ecological capital, and to increasing human, social, and manufactured capital. However, the programme also had some unintended negative and crowding-out effects on ecological and social capital, and on innovation. A methodological conclusion is that the evaluations lacked some essential information for assessing SD-effects. For example, more than half of the evaluations scored low on intervention effects, a key criterion in the review. Reviews of SD-effects need to compile knowledge from evaluations that use different approaches with varying quality. What is defined as acceptable quality determines if comprehensive conclusions of SD effects can be drawn.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 12, no 2, 85-105 p.
Keyword [en]
sustainable development, meta-evaluation, narrative synthesis, environmental programmes, programme effects
National Category
Sociology Political Science Environmental Sciences
Research subject
Sociology; statskunskap
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-100632DOI: 10.1080/1943815X.2014.1001857ISI: 000359855800001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-100632DiVA: diva2:792909
Available from: 2015-03-05 Created: 2015-03-05 Last updated: 2017-12-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Magnus, LarssonHanberger, Anders
By organisation
Department of SociologyUmeå Centre for Evaluation Research (UCER)
In the same journal
Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences
SociologyPolitical ScienceEnvironmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 118 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf