Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Who is afraid of SGEI?: services of general economic interest in EU law with a case study on social services in Swedish systems of choice
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
2015 (English)Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

For a long time confined to Article 106(2) TFEU, a provision allowing to justify regulatory measures derogating from Treaty rules by invoking their necessity in order to enable undertakings entrusted with services of general economic interest (SGEIs) to fulfil their special tasks, SGEI has become a constitutional concept of EU law. In the post-Lisbon EU Treaties it is subject to new provisions, in particular Article 14 TFEU and the Protocol on services on general interest.

As a legal concept allowing to balance EU market integration and the pursuit of legitimate national policies related to public services, SGEI is also a political concept, and therefore its legal interpretation is an ultra-sensitive matter. This dissertation proposes that SGEI cannot anymore be contrived as a narrow concept of EU competition law, but must be understood as a broad public service concept encompassing both public authorities’ policy missions and undertakings’ public service obligations. This follows from an analysis of the CJEU’s understanding of the EU concept of SGEI in the frame of Hirschman’s theory on exit and voice, and thus on the double background of its own case law foreclosing exit from EU market rules for public services, and of its acknowledgement of the SGEI “voice” this has led to in the Treaties. The analysis shows that the CJEU’s bifurcation by the notions of “public service obligations” and “public service tasks”, is aimed at applying the Treaty SGEI provisions loyally without pre-empting their political use by the Union and the Member States.

To shed some light on the political use of the EU concept of SGEI made by the EU legislator and the Member States in a context of Europeanisation and liberalisation, this dissertation scrutinizes also how the new EU procurement and state aid rules applying to social services relate to the Treaty principles on SGEIs, and how the Swedish systems of choice for elderly home care and education relate to the EU rules. It analyses whether these relationships, if too transparent and loyal, may constrain the process of liberalisation of social services in the Member States, and whether it can explain that an explicit characterisation of social services as SGEIs seems to be avoided in EU procurement law and in Swedish law.


Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Umeå: Umeå universitet , 2015. , 497 p.
Skrifter från Juridiska institutionen vid Umeå universitet, ISSN 1404-9198 ; 32
Keyword [en]
services of general economic interest, social services, Swedish law
National Category
Law (excluding Law and Society)
Research subject
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-101242ISBN: 978-91-7601-237-6OAI: diva2:798102
Public defence
2015-04-17, Hörsal D, Umeå universitet, Umeå, 10:15 (English)
Available from: 2015-03-27 Created: 2015-03-25 Last updated: 2016-02-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

spikblad(95 kB)123 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 95 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type spikbladMimetype application/pdf
The full text will be freely available from 2018-02-27 00:00
Available from 2018-02-27 00:00

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wehlander, Caroline
By organisation
Department of Law
Law (excluding Law and Society)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 367 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 1461 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link