Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Women's relative immunity to the socio-economic health gradient: artifact or real?
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Umeå Centre for Gender Studies (UCGS). Queens University, Family Medciine, Kingston, Canada.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Family Medicine.
2015 (English)In: Global health action, ISSN 1654-9880, E-ISSN 1654-9880, Vol. 8, 27259Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Individual and area socio-economic status (SES) are significant predictors of morbidity and mortality in developed and developing countries. However, the span in health from poorest to richest, that is, the socio-economic gradient, appears steeper for men than women.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim is to understand women's apparent immunity to the health harms of the SES gradient.

DESIGN: Findings from a non-systematic search of Medline for population-based, SES gradient studies reporting results for both men and women and with health outcomes of morbidity, mortality or self-rated health (SRH) were reflectively analyzed.

RESULTS: The 36 papers reviewed generally showed women to be relatively immune to the SES gradient for all but cardiovascular health outcomes. However, addressing the interconnected nature of socio-economic circumstances, exploring whether some measures of SES had ambiguous meanings for either women or men, including modifiers of SES such as household circumstances, social capital or area gender equity, or using indicators of area SES that were contextual rather than aggregates of individual, compositional measures increased the SES gradient for women. Outcome measures that combined mental and physical health, accounted for gender differences in SRH and adjusted for sex-specific differences in causes of mortality also explained some of the observed amelioration of the SES gradient among women.

CONCLUSIONS: Socio-economic circumstances have a real and sustained impact on individual health. The SES gradient appears stronger for men than for women for all health outcomes other than heart disease. However, some of the observed variability between men and women may be an artifact of biased methodology. Considering webs of causation rather than individual markers of SES along with other sources of gender bias can explain much of women's blunted socio-economic gradient and deepen understanding of the pathways from SES to morbidity and mortality overall.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 8, 27259
Keyword [en]
gender,  women,  men,  socio-economic status,  sex factors,  mortality,  morbidity,  cardiovascular disease,  social capital,  deprivation index
National Category
Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-102926DOI: 10.3402/gha.v8.27259ISI: 000354046100001PubMedID: 25947541OAI: diva2:811227
Available from: 2015-05-11 Created: 2015-05-11 Last updated: 2015-07-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(470 kB)39 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 470 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Phillips, Susan PHamberg, Katarina
By organisation
Umeå Centre for Gender Studies (UCGS)Family Medicine
In the same journal
Global health action
Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 39 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 77 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link