Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Meaning of work and the process of returning after head and neck cancer
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Social Work.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Otorhinolaryngology. Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Biosciences.
Institutionen för kirurgiska vetenskaper, Öron-, näs- och halssjukdomar, Uppsala universitet.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Nursing.
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: Supportive Care in Cancer, ISSN 0941-4355, E-ISSN 1433-7339, Vol. 24, no 1, 205-213 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose: The purposes of this study were (1) to investigate employment status at diagnosis, sick leave, and returning to work patterns in correlation to quality of life, anxiety, and depression in patients treated for head and neck cancer (HNC) and (2) to explore patients' experiences of the process of returning to work.

Methods: Sixty-six patients with HNC (aged 34-66 years) were repeatedly interviewed over a period of 24 months. Interview responses that concerned the patients' experiences and ideas about work were categorised using the similarities-differences technique. Questionnaires on quality of life, anxiety, and depression were used to describe the patient characteristics and the differences between groups.

Results: In total, 53 % of the patients had returned to work at 24 months after treatment, and 17 % were deceased. Several quality of life parameters were significantly worse for patients not working at 24 months after treatment. Nine categories were found to describe the return-to-work-process starting with symptoms causing sick leave, thoughts about the sick leave, and ending with the return to work and/or retirement.

Conclusions: Returning to work is an important part of life because it structures everyday life and strengthens the individual's identity. The quality of life results showed significant differences between workers and non-workers at the 24 month follow-up. The patients need to be both physically and mentally prepared for the process of returning to work. It is important to take an individual rehabilitation approach to guide and support the patients in returning to work and regaining an important aspect of their everyday life. In such an approach, it is vital to understand the patients' overall life context and the patients' own perspective on the process and meaning associated with work.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer-Verlag New York, 2016. Vol. 24, no 1, 205-213 p.
Keyword [en]
Return to work, Sick leave, Head and neck cancer, Everyday life, Quality of life
National Category
Social Work Cancer and Oncology Nursing
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-103302DOI: 10.1007/s00520-015-2769-7ISI: 000365817800027PubMedID: 26003423OAI: diva2:813751

Acknowledgment of funding: This study was sponsored by the Swedish Cancer Society, Lions Cancer Research Foundation at Umeå University, the Swedish Laryng Foundation, and the Cancer Research Foundation of Northern Sweden.

Available from: 2015-05-25 Created: 2015-05-20 Last updated: 2015-12-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Isaksson, JoakimWilms, TorbenFransson, Per
By organisation
Department of Social WorkOtorhinolaryngologyDepartment of Medical BiosciencesDepartment of Nursing
In the same journal
Supportive Care in Cancer
Social WorkCancer and OncologyNursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 283 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link