Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Multivariate Statistical Assessment of Predictors of Firefighters' Muscular and Aerobic Work Capacity
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Idrottsmedicin. Winternet, Boden, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2339-6381
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Chemistry.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Idrottsmedicin. Winternet, Boden, Sweden.
2015 (English)In: PLoS ONE, ISSN 1932-6203, Vol. 10, no 3, e0118945Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Physical capacity has previously been deemed important for firefighters physical work capacity, and aerobic fitness, muscular strength, and muscular endurance are the most frequently investigated parameters of importance. Traditionally, bivariate and multivariate linear regression statistics have been used to study relationships between physical capacities and work capacities among firefighters. An alternative way to handle datasets consisting of numerous correlated variables is to use multivariate projection analyses, such as Orthogonal Projection to Latent Structures. The first aim of the present study was to evaluate the prediction and predictive power of field and laboratory tests, respectively, on firefighters' physical work capacity on selected work tasks. Also, to study if valid predictions could be achieved without anthropometric data. The second aim was to externally validate selected models. The third aim was to validate selected models on firefighters' and on civilians'. A total of 38 (26 men and 12 women) + 90 (38 men and 52 women) subjects were included in the models and the external validation, respectively. The best prediction (R-2) and predictive power (Q(2)) of Stairs, Pulling, Demolition, Terrain, and Rescue work capacities included field tests (R-2 = 0.73 to 0.84, Q(2) = 0.68 to 0.82). The best external validation was for Stairs work capacity (R-2 = 0.80) and worst for Demolition work capacity (R-2 = 0.40). In conclusion, field and laboratory tests could equally well predict physical work capacities for fire-fighting work tasks, and models excluding anthropometric data were valid. The predictive power was satisfactory for all included work tasks except Demolition.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 10, no 3, e0118945
National Category
Sport and Fitness Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-102366DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118945ISI: 000351183500054PubMedID: 25775243OAI: diva2:814923
Available from: 2015-05-28 Created: 2015-04-23 Last updated: 2015-05-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2983 kB)90 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2983 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lindberg, Ann-SofieAntti, HenrikMalm, Christer
By organisation
IdrottsmedicinDepartment of Chemistry
In the same journal
Sport and Fitness Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 90 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 110 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link