umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Subsidized fencing of livestock as a means of increasing tolerance for wolves
Department of Ecology, Grimsö Wildlife Research Station, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Umeå School of Business and Economics (USBE), Economics.
2011 (English)In: Ecology & society, ISSN 1708-3087, E-ISSN 1708-3087, Vol. 16, no 1, 16Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Studies of how proactive measures to reduce livestock depredation by carnivores affect human tolerance toward carnivores are extremely rare. Nevertheless, substantial amounts of money are spent each year on proactive measures to facilitate large carnivore conservation. The objective of this study was to assess how subsidies for proactive measures to reduce sheep losses to wolves are associated with public attitudes toward wolves. The respondents were 445 people living inside wolf territories in Sweden. Our data set is unique because we combine wolf territory level information regarding proactive subsidies and wolf attacks on dogs and sheep with geographical information of the respondents. Consequently, the respondents can be assigned to a specific wolf territory. The number of wolf attacks on sheep and dogs in the respective territories as well as the number of years that the wolf territory had existed did not affect human attitudes toward wolves. Subsidies for proactive measures to reduce wolf predation on sheep significantly increased positive attitudes toward wolf presence on the local scale. The magnitude of the effect of subsidies for proactive measures was comparable to the effect of other variables well known to affect human attitudes toward wolves such as age or education. Our data show that subsidies not only made the already positive more positive, but also made people with negative attitudes to wolf presence locally, less negative. Our conclusion is, therefore, that subsidies for proactive measures are an effective tool when working with "the human dimension" of conservation biology.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Resilience Alliance , 2011. Vol. 16, no 1, 16
Keyword [en]
attitudes, depredation, electric fencing, human dimension, proactive measures, wolves
National Category
Ecology Environmental Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-104553ISI: 000289081200030OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-104553DiVA: diva2:821991
Available from: 2015-06-16 Created: 2015-06-11 Last updated: 2017-12-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/art16/

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sjöström, Magnus
By organisation
Economics
In the same journal
Ecology & society
EcologyEnvironmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 21 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf