umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Therapeutic stimulation versus ablation
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience, Clinical Neuroscience.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience, Clinical Neuroscience.
2013 (English)In: Brain Stimulation, Volume 116: Handbook of Clinical Neurology / [ed] Aminoff, Boller, Swaab, Toronto: Elsevier, 2013, 116, 63-71 p.Chapter in book (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

The renaissance of functional stereotactic neurosurgery was pioneered in the mid 1980s by Laitinen’s introduction of Leksell’s posteroventral pallidotomy for Parkinson´s disease (PD). This ablative procedure experienced a worldwide spread in the 1990s, owing to its excellent effect on dyskinesias and other symptoms of post-l-dopa PD. Modern deep brain stimulation (DBS), pioneered by Benabid and Pollak in 1987 for the treatment of tremor, first became popular when it was applied to the subthalamic nucleus (STN) in the mid 1990s, where it demonstrated a striking effect on all cardinal symptoms of advanced PD, and permitted reduced dosages of medication. DBS, as a nondestructive, adaptable, and reversible procedure that is proving safe in bilateral surgery on basal ganglia, has great appeal to clinicians and patients alike, despite the fact that it is expensive, laborious, and relies on very strict patient selection criteria, especially for STN DBS. Psychiatric surgery has experienced the same phenomenon, with DBS supplanting completely stereotactic ablative procedures. This chapter discusses the pros and cons of ablation versus stimulation and investigates the reasons why DBS has overshadowed proven efficient ablative procedures such as pallidotomy for PD, and capsulotomy and cingulotomy for obsessive–compulsive disorder and depression. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Toronto: Elsevier, 2013, 116. 63-71 p.
Series
Handbook of Clinical Neurology, 116
Keyword [en]
Therapeutic stimulation, Neurology
National Category
Neurology
Research subject
Neurosurgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-105934ISBN: 9780444534972 (print)ISBN: 0444534970 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-105934DiVA: diva2:838958
Available from: 2015-07-01 Created: 2015-07-01 Last updated: 2015-07-03Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hariz, MarwanHariz, Gun-Marie
By organisation
Clinical Neuroscience
Neurology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 54 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf