umu.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Gender differences in refractive prediction in refractive lens exchange surgery
Umeå universitet, Medicinska fakulteten, Institutionen för klinisk vetenskap, Oftalmiatrik.
Umeå universitet, Medicinska fakulteten, Institutionen för klinisk vetenskap, Oftalmiatrik.
Umeå universitet, Medicinska fakulteten, Institutionen för klinisk vetenskap, Oftalmiatrik.
Umeå universitet, Medicinska fakulteten, Institutionen för klinisk vetenskap, Oftalmiatrik.
2015 (Engelska)Ingår i: European Journal of Ophthalmology, ISSN 1120-6721, E-ISSN 1724-6016, Vol. 25, nr 2, s. 108-111Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose: To compare the refractive outcomes after refractive lens exchange (RLE) surgery with regards to gender and intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formula. Methods: A cohort of consecutive patients operated with bilateral same-day RLE surgery at a private eye clinic (n = 512) was studied. Target refraction was emmetropia in all cases and Haigis formula was used for all IOL power calculations. One month after surgery, subjective refraction was assessed and the absolute refractive prediction error (RPEAbs), as well as the refractive prediction error with correct signs (RPESign), was calculated, as were the refractive outcomes with the SRK/T formula. Results: For the whole cohort, the Haigis formula rendered a significantly smaller RPEAbs than the SRK/T formula (0.16 +/- 0.26 D vs 0.32 +/- 0.30 D; p<0.001). No gender difference in RPEAbs was seen. A slight myopic error was seen with the SRK/T formula in women, and a slight hyperopic error in men (-0.06 +/- 0.47 D vs + 0.16 +/- 0.39 D; p<0.001). No similar gender difference was seen with the Haigis formula (+ 0.05 +/- 0.29 D vs + 0.05 +/- 0.31 D; p = NS). Axial length, anterior chamber depth, and corneal steepness differed significantly between the sexes. Conclusions: The Haigis formula generally performed better in this RLE cohort. The SRK/T formula generates a small myopic error in women and a hyperopic error in men, associated with flatter corneas, longer axial lengths, and deeper anterior chambers in the latter.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Wichtig Publishing , 2015. Vol. 25, nr 2, s. 108-111
Nyckelord [en]
Biometry, Refractive lens exchange, Refractive prediction error, Sex
Nationell ämneskategori
Klinisk medicin
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-106800DOI: 10.5301/ejo.5000522ISI: 000357614000008PubMedID: 25264119OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-106800DiVA, id: diva2:847518
Tillgänglig från: 2015-08-20 Skapad: 2015-08-07 Senast uppdaterad: 2018-06-07Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextPubMed

Personposter BETA

Lundqvist, OskarKoskela, TimoBehndig, Anders

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Lundqvist, OskarKoskela, TimoBehndig, Anders
Av organisationen
Oftalmiatrik
I samma tidskrift
European Journal of Ophthalmology
Klinisk medicin

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 242 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf