umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The role of adjacent vegetation on the recovery of riparian flora: Effect of upstream and upland vascular vegetation after stream restoration in a boreal catchment
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences. (Landscape ecology)
2015 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Restoration of streams that were formerly channelized for timber-floating has become increasingly common. Generally, this restoration returns boulders from riparian zones to streams, leading to wider, more heterogeneous channels with slower flows. The primary goal is to enhance fish populations, but riparian vegetation is also expected to be favoured. However, increases in floristic diversity have not been observed and reasons for this slow response are still unknown. One possible explanation might be the lack of colonist pools. I therefore investigated how surrounding plant compositions influence riparian recovery. The vascular plant flora was identified in riparian sites and in adjacent upstream riparian and upland sites. Four reach types were included: unchannelized, channelized, restored and demonstration restored. Species richness and floristic similarities among types of sites and reaches were compared. Correlations with upland and upstream channel slopes were made and the importance of variation in seed floating ability was tested. The results show that unchannelized reaches were floristically similar to their adjacent upstream riparian and upland sites, whereas channelized reaches showed more different floras. Restoration created a somewhat more homogeneous flora among the three site types and demonstration restored reaches were most similar to upstream sites. Soil moisture conditions (i.e. wetland vs. forest) in the uplands had stronger impacts on species similarities than upland or upstream channel slopes. I conclude that adjacent sites are important for floristic recovery of riparian reaches and that demonstration restoration is most advantageous for riparian recovery. I recommend protection of upland sites from forestry to facilitate recovery.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015.
Keyword [en]
Channelization, demonstration restoration, species composition, species richness
National Category
Ecology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-108082OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-108082DiVA: diva2:851106
Educational program
Master's Programme in Geoecology
Supervisors
Examiners
Projects
Local- and landscape-scale effects on biodiversity after stream restoration
Available from: 2015-09-03 Created: 2015-09-03 Last updated: 2015-09-03Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(817 kB)166 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 817 kBChecksum SHA-512
20f2157fe2e21a7e8e6e91c39ef22abb61b539b2474e025360071300788552967c8ad29559b22b0054ebbf11bef8d7d628d3c3ae05a3cf3d11b00b42375df9cc
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences
Ecology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 166 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 185 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf