Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Making Architecture Politically: Spring lecture series 2013 and UMA newspaper
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Umeå School of Architecture. (Towards a Relational Architecture + UMA PhD School of research)
2013 (English)Collection (editor) (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
Abstract [en]

Making Architecture Politically

With the fall of the Berlin Wall, and the collapse of Eastern European communism, the emergence of Third Way politics, and the subsequent rise of neo-liberalism, society became post-political. Discourses and practices of architecture not only suffered, but also enhanced this culture of de-politicization. The problem today is clearly not to make political architecture – neoliberal architecture is everywhere today –, but to make architecture politically. Now that the current economic crisis acts as late capitalism’s moment of truth architects should develop new visions, and help create projects that activate emancipation, surpassing the failure of neoliberalism. What we look for is a new beginning, an optimism - not another pessimism - of the architect as public intellectual that engages the optimism of the will and opens doors towards new social practices.

Architecture cannot, of course, conduct parliamentary politics. Spatial constellations can deliver no advice on how to vote or convey messages about social and political problems, but architecture is political precisely because of the distance it takes from these functions. Architecture is political in the way in which, as a space-time sensorium, it organizes being together or apart, and the way it defines outside or inside. Architecture is political also in the manner in which it makes the many controversies of reality visible by means of its own spatial and aesthetic syntax, and can enacts new spatial and aesthetic formations of sociability from within. What we need in order to make room for the civil in our society is, according to Ariella Azoulay, ”the capacity known as political imagination, that is to say, the ability to imagine a political state of being that deviates significantly from the prevailing state of affairs“ What kind of political imagination – rethinking the political – can the practice and theory of architecture mobilize when it makes architecture politically is the focus of the UMA Spring lecture series of 2013.

The lecture series was organized by Roemer van Toorn in collaboration with Peter Kjaer, Oren Lieberman, Albert o Altés Arlandis, and Cecilia Andersson.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Umeå: UMA Press , 2013.
, UMA lecture series and roundtable conversations
National Category
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-108585OAI: diva2:853649
Available from: 2015-09-14 Created: 2015-09-14 Last updated: 2015-09-14

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

By organisation
Umeå School of Architecture

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 15 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link