umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Four types of interference competition and their impacts on the ecology and evolution of size-structured populations and communities
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics. Technical University of Denmark, Denmark ; International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.
2015 (English)In: Journal of Theoretical Biology, ISSN 0022-5193, E-ISSN 1095-8541, Vol. 380, 280-290 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

We investigate how four types of interference competition which alternatively affect foraging, metabolism, survival, and reproduction impact the ecology and evolution of size-structured populations. Even though all four types of interference competition reduce population biomass, interference competition at intermediate intensity sometimes significantly increases the abundance of adult individuals and the population's reproduction rate. We find that foraging and metabolic interference evolutionarily favor smaller maturation size when interference is weak and larger maturation size when interference is strong. The evolutionary response to survival interference and reproductive interference is always larger maturation size. We also investigate how the four types of interference competition impact the evolutionary dynamics and resultant diversity and trophic structure of size-structured communities. Like other types of trait-mediated competition, all four types of interference competition can induce disruptive selection and thus promote initial diversification. Even though foraging interference and reproductive interference are more potent in promoting initial diversification, they catalyze the formation of diverse communities with complex trophic structure only at high levels of interference intensity. By contrast, survival interference does so already at intermediate levels, while reproductive interference can only support relatively smaller communities with simpler trophic structure. Taken together, our results show how the type and intensity of interference competition jointly affect coexistence patterns in structured population models. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 380, 280-290 p.
Keyword [en]
Adaptive dynamics, Biodiversity, Evolutionary branching, Food webs, Size structured populations
National Category
Ecology Evolutionary Biology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-108121DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2015.05.023ISI: 000359505200027PubMedID: 26025318OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-108121DiVA: diva2:856066
Available from: 2015-09-23 Created: 2015-09-04 Last updated: 2017-12-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Zhang, Lai
By organisation
Department of Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics
In the same journal
Journal of Theoretical Biology
EcologyEvolutionary Biology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 57 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf