Linnaeus's Questions to the Sami Herdsman: The ID-versus-Science Issue in a Nutshell
2010 (English)In: Philosophy of the social sciences, ISSN 0048-3931, E-ISSN 1552-7441, Vol. 40, no 3, 456-466 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
According to a U.S. court ruling, intelligent design (ID) theory is religious in nature, not scientific, and must not be taught in schools. In opposition, Fuller argues for a closer rapport between science and religion. Here it is emphasized that any allegedly scientific conclusion from design in nature to the existence of God is a hypothesis subject to the same quality norms as empirical hypotheses in general. By quotations from his Iter Lapponicum, Linnaeus is summoned in support of a strictly immanent conception of science, against Fuller's suggestion that Linnaeus' personal piety could be a reason for considering ID scientific.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2010. Vol. 40, no 3, 456-466 p.
intelligent design, neo-Darwinism, Kitzmiller case, Carolus Linnaeus, Iter Lapponicum, reindeer clicking
Religious Studies Evolutionary Biology
IdentifiersURN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-109690DOI: 10.1177/0048393110368042ISI: 000280707700006OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-109690DiVA: diva2:858926