umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Is anaphoric reference cooperative?
Umeå University, Faculty of Arts, Department of language studies.
School of Psychology, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
2016 (English)In: Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, ISSN 1747-0218, E-ISSN 1747-0226, Vol. 69, no 6, 1109-1128 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Two experiments investigated whether the choice of anaphoric expression is affected by the presence of an addressee. Following a context sentence and visual scene, participants described a target scene that required anaphoric reference. They described the scene either to an addressee (Experiment 1) or without an addressee (Experiment 2). When an addressee was present in the task, participants used more pronouns and fewer repeated noun phrases when the referent was the grammatical subject in the context sentence than when it was the grammatical object and they used more pronouns when there was no competitor than when there was. They used fewer pronouns and more repeated noun phrases when a visual competitor was present in the scene than when there was no visual competitor. In the absence of an addressee, linguistic context effects were the same as those when an addressee was present, but the visual effect of the competitor disappeared. We conclude that visual salience effects are due to adjustments that speakers make when they produce reference for an addressee, whereas linguistic salience effects appear whether or not speakers have addressees.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2016. Vol. 69, no 6, 1109-1128 p.
Keyword [en]
Anaphor, Audience design, Linguistic salience, Visual context
National Category
Specific Languages
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-110787DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1070184ISI: 000372182300008PubMedID: 26165163OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-110787DiVA: diva2:865483
Available from: 2015-10-28 Created: 2015-10-28 Last updated: 2017-01-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kantola, Leila
By organisation
Department of language studies
In the same journal
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Specific Languages

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 172 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf