Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Why are some nations more successful than others in research impact?: a comparison between Denmark and Sweden
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Plant Physiology. Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Umeå Plant Science Centre (UPSC).
2015 (English)In: Incentives and Performance: Governance of Research Organizations / [ed] Isabell M. Welpe, Jutta Wollersheim, Stefanie Ringelhan, Margit Osterloh, Springer, 2015, 241-257 p.Chapter in book (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Bibliometric impact analyses show that Swedish research has less international visibility than Danish research. When taking a global view on all subject fields and selecting publications cited higher than the 90th percentile, i.e., the Top 10 %—publications, the Swedish Research Council shows that although Sweden ranks 15 % above world average, Denmark, the Netherlands and Switzerland rank 35–40 % above. To explain these different performances, The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences asked us to compare the national research systems on three levels: priority setting at national level, governance of universities and direction and funding of research. There are of course many similarities between the Danish and Swedish research systems but there are still subtle differences that have developed over time, which may explain the different international visibility. First of all, it does not depend on different levels of public spending on research and development. However, the core funding of universities relative external funding is higher in Denmark than in Sweden. The academic leadership of Danish universities in terms of board, vice-chancellor, faculty dean and department chair is also more coherent and focused on priority setting, recruitment, organization and deployment of resources to establish research environments that operate at the forefront of international research. On all these points we see a weaker leadership in Sweden. Furthermore, over the last 20 years, public funding of research in Sweden has become more and more unpredictable and program oriented with many new actors, while the Danish funding system, although it also has developed over time, shows more consistency with strong actors to fund individuals with novel ideas. The research policy in Sweden has also developed multiple, sometimes even conflicting goals, which have undermined conditions for high-impact research, while in Denmark a policy to support excellence in research has been more coherent.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2015. 241-257 p.
National Category
Sociology Information Studies
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-111739DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-09785-5_15ScopusID: 2-s2.0-84944611681ISBN: 978-3-319-09785-5ISBN: 978-3-319-09784-8OAI: diva2:872746
Available from: 2015-11-20 Created: 2015-11-20 Last updated: 2015-11-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Öquist, Gunnar
By organisation
Department of Plant PhysiologyUmeå Plant Science Centre (UPSC)
SociologyInformation Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 94 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link