Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Does stakeholder pressure influence corporate GHG emissions reporting?: empirical evidence from Europe
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Umeå School of Business and Economics (USBE).
(ICMA Centre, Henley Business School, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
Department of Accounting, Illinois State University, Bloomington-Normal, Illinois, USA.
(KEDGE Business School Marseille France.
2015 (English)In: Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, ISSN 0951-3574, Vol. 28, no 7, 1047-1074 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to seek to shed light on the practice of incomplete corporate disclosure of quantitative Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and investigates whether external stakeholder pressure influences the existence, and separately, the completeness of voluntary GHG emissions disclosures by 431 European companies. Design/methodology/approach - A classification of reporting completeness is developed with respect to the scope, type and reporting boundary of GHG emissions based on the guidelines of the GHG Protocol, Global Reporting Initiative and the Carbon Disclosure Project. Logistic regression analysis is applied to examine whether proxies for exposure to climate change concerns from different stakeholder groups influence the existence and/or completeness of quantitative GHG emissions disclosure. Findings - From 2005 to 2009, on average only 15 percent of companies that disclose GHG emissions report them in a manner that the authors consider complete. Results of regression analyses suggest that external stakeholder pressure is a determinant of the existence but not the completeness of emissions disclosure. Findings are consistent with stakeholder theory arguments that companies respond to external stakeholder pressure to report GHG emissions, but also with legitimacy theory claims that firms can use carbon disclosure, in this case the incomplete reporting of emissions, as a symbolic act to address legitimacy exposures. Practical implications - Bringing corporate GHG emissions disclosure in line with recommended guidelines will require either more direct stakeholder pressure or, perhaps, a mandated disclosure regime. In the meantime, users of the data will need to carefully consider the relevance of the reported data and develop the necessary competencies to detect and control for its incompleteness. A more troubling concern is that stakeholders may instead grow to accept less than complete disclosure. Originality/value - The paper represents the first large-scale empirical study into the completeness of companies' disclosure of quantitative GHG emissions and is the first to analyze these disclosures in the context of stakeholder pressure and its relation to legitimation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Emerald insight , 2015. Vol. 28, no 7, 1047-1074 p.
Keyword [en]
Environmental reporting, Carbon accounting, Sustainability reporting, Climate change disclosure, GHG emissions, GRI
National Category
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-111520DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-12-2013-1547ISI: 000363421100002OAI: diva2:877580
Available from: 2015-12-07 Created: 2015-11-13 Last updated: 2015-12-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Liesen, Andrea
By organisation
Umeå School of Business and Economics (USBE)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle ScholarTotal: 1 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 132 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link