umu.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Possibilities for evaluating cost-effectiveness of family system nursing: an example based on Family Health Conversations with families in which a middle-aged family member had suffered stroke
Umeå universitet, Medicinska fakulteten, Institutionen för omvårdnad.
Umeå universitet, Medicinska fakulteten, Institutionen för omvårdnad.
Umeå universitet, Medicinska fakulteten, Institutionen för omvårdnad.
Umeå universitet, Medicinska fakulteten, Institutionen för omvårdnad.ORCID-id: 0000-0003-3716-6445
Visa övriga samt affilieringar
2016 (Engelska)Ingår i: Nordic journal of nursing research, ISSN 2057-1585, E-ISSN 2057-1593, Vol. 38, nr 2, s. 74-81Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

Family Health Conversations (FamHC) increase health and well-being, but knowledge about their cost-effectiveness, and how to best calculate this, is lacking. In this feasibility study we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of using FamHC with families in which a middle-aged family member had suffered stroke. Seven families participated in a FamHC intervention and seven families received ordinary care. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was estimated with SF-6D and EQ-5D over a six-month period. The costeffectiveness of the intervention was calculated. Families receiving FamHC intervention had significantly increased HRQoL at follow up. Cost per quality adjusted life year differed depending on the instrument and analysis method used in the calculation. However, all calculations showed that FamHC were cost-effective. We conclude that FamHC significantly increase HRQoL and suggest that they are cost-effective. Both instruments seemed to be able to capture changes. Considering the participants’ experience of answering the two instruments, we advocate the use of EQ-5D.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Sage Publications, 2016. Vol. 38, nr 2, s. 74-81
Nyckelord [en]
cost–benefit analysis, Family Health Conversations, family nursing, stroke
Nationell ämneskategori
Omvårdnad
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-113460DOI: 10.1177/0107408315610076OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-113460DiVA, id: diva2:885148
Tillgänglig från: 2015-12-18 Skapad: 2015-12-18 Senast uppdaterad: 2018-06-07Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltext

Personposter BETA

Lämås, KristinaSundin, KarinJacobsson, CatrineSaveman, Britt-Inger

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Lämås, KristinaSundin, KarinJacobsson, CatrineSaveman, Britt-Inger
Av organisationen
Institutionen för omvårdnad
I samma tidskrift
Nordic journal of nursing research
Omvårdnad

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 308 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf