umu.sePublications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
The Buttazzoni Classification of Distal Radial Fractures in Adults: interobserver and Intraobserver Reliability
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery. Sundsvall Hospital.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery. Sundsvall Hospital.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences.
Show others and affiliations
2009 (English)In: Hand, ISSN 1558-9447, Vol. 4, no 3, 283-288 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Despite the fact that distal radial fracture is the commonest fracture, there is a little evidence-based knowledge about the value of its classification to guide management and predict prognosis. The available classification systems are either complicated or weakly applicable in clinical practice. Older's classification is the most reliable, but does not cover all radial fracture types. We evaluated the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of a new classification system which is a modification of Older's classification covering all radial fracture types. Two hundred and thirty-two consecutive adult patients with acute distal radial fractures were blindly evaluated according to the new classification by three orthopedic surgeons twice with 1-year interval. The interobserver reliability was measured using the Fleiss kappa coefficient, and the intraobserver reliability was measured using the Cohen's kappa coefficient. The new classification showed fair to substantial interobserver and intraobserver reliability, i.e., results comparable to the reliability of commonly used classification systems. The reliability was better for younger patients and when evaluation was carried out by hand-surgery-interested orthopedic surgeons. The new classification system is simple, covers all radial fracture types, and has an acceptable reliability. Further studies are needed to judge its ability to direct management and predict prognosis.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2009. Vol. 4, no 3, 283-288 p.
Keyword [en]
Reliability, Classification, Distal radial fractures, Kappa
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-113946DOI: 10.1007/s11552-009-9163-1PubMedID: 19172363OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-113946DiVA: diva2:891826
Available from: 2016-01-07 Created: 2016-01-07 Last updated: 2016-03-23Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Distal Radius Fractures: aspects on radiological and clinical outcome and evaluation of a new classification system
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Distal Radius Fractures: aspects on radiological and clinical outcome and evaluation of a new classification system
2016 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Distal radius fracture (DRF) is the most common fracture encountered in clinical practice. Every year, more than 20000 people in Sweden suffer from this injury. It has been shown that there is a correlation between malalignment and function following distal radial fractures and malunion may cause persistent pain and disability.

A problem has been in making a correct initial assessment of the fracture. Many fractures are unstable despite an acceptable position on the initial radiographic examination or following a successful closed fracture reduction.

Numerous classification systems have been developed for evaluation of DRF in order to predict the outcome. However, the values of these are limited since they have not shown satisfactory reliability. Furthermore, the utility of these systems to predict radiographic or clinical outcome is not yet proven. These shortcomings may be one reason why optimal DRF management is still controversial. Requests for a new classification system of DRF, predictive of outcome and easy to use, have been made.

Improvement in initial assessment of DRF will benefit a large group of patients, as well as the society, by reducing persistent symptoms and disability.

Study I: In this study we evaluated the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of a new classification system (the Buttazzoni classification). Two hundred and thirty-two patients with acute DRF were blindly evaluated using the new classification by three orthopaedic surgeons twice with a 1-year interval. The new classification showed fair to substantial interobserver and intraobserver reliability, i.e., results comparable with other commonly used classification systems.

Study II: This was a prospective multicenter study of fracture stability in 428 DRF. The study investigated whether cortical comminution and intra-articular involvement, as well as the new classification system, could predict displacement in DRF. Logistic regression analysis showed that initial position of the fracture and volar or dorsal comminution predicted later displacement, while intra-articular involvement did not. Volar comminution was the strongest predictor of displacement. The new classification system, which is the first to include volar comminution as a separate parameter, was highly predictive of fracture instability. Furthermore we found that it is quite common for non-operatively treated fractures to displace at a later stage than two weeks.

Study IV: In study II it was found that late displacement of DRF, still in acceptable radiologic position after 10-14 days, occurred in approximately 1/3 of cases. Despite this, we have not been able to find any study focusing on evaluating the clinical outcome in patients with late displacement. Two hundred and nine unilateral DRF from study II were still in good position after 10-14 days and were included in the study. One hundred and seventy five patients had radiographs taken at a minimum of 3 months and a clinical examination 1 year after the fracture. Late displaced distal radius fractures had significantly higher loss of ROM and grip strength compared to fractures that didn’t displace. No significant differences were seen in subjective outcome.

In conclusion, initial position of the fracture predicted later displacement and was the most important parameter in predicting clinical outcome. Comminution of the fracture also affected radiological stability and clinical outcome. Volar comminuted fractures are highly unstable and need surgical intervention if displacement is to be avoided. Intra-articular involvement affected clinical outcome. Late displacement is common in DRF and may result in loss of range of motion and grip strength. To detect late displacement, DRF should be followed for more than 2 weeks.

The new classification system had a moderate reliability and reproducibility. The classification was found predictive of radiologic and objective clinical outcome. However, it was not predictive of subjective outcome. The classification system was also predictive of fractures at risk for late displacement.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Umeå: Umeå universitet, 2016. 95 p.
Series
Umeå University medical dissertations, ISSN 0346-6612 ; 1782
Keyword
Distal radius fracture, Buttazzoni classification, volar, comminution, reliability, radiological outcome, clinical outcome, late displacement
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Research subject
Orthopaedics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-118544 (URN)978-91-7601-413-4 (ISBN)
Public defence
2016-04-15, Aulan plan 1 sektion blått, Sundsvalls sjukhus, Sundsvall, 09:00 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2016-03-24 Created: 2016-03-23 Last updated: 2016-03-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wadsten, Mats ÅSayed-Noor, Arkan SSjödén, Göran OSvensson, Olle
By organisation
Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 38 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link