Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Percutaneous Balloon Compression vs Percutaneous Retrogasserian Glycerol Rhizotomy for the Primary Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience, Clinical Neuroscience.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience, Clinical Neuroscience.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience, Clinical Neuroscience.
2016 (English)In: Neurosurgery, ISSN 0148-396X, E-ISSN 1524-4040, Vol. 78, no 3, 421-428 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Despite >30 years of clinical use, the literature is still sparse when it comes to comparisons between percutaneous balloon compression (PBC) and percutaneous retrogasserian glycerol rhizolysis (PRGR) as treatments for trigeminal neuralgia.

OBJECTIVE: To perform a retrospective cohort comparison between PBC and PRGR with regard to therapeutic effect, side effects, and complications.

METHODS: Medical records and follow-up data from 124 primary PRGRs performed from 1986 to 2000 and 82 primary PBCs performed from 2000 to 2013 were reviewed. All patients had undergone clinical sensory testing and assessment of sensory thresholds. Analyses were performed to compare duration of pain relief, frequency of sensory disturbances, and side effects.

RESULTS: Median duration of pain relief was 21 months after PRGR and 20 months after PBC. Both methods carried a high risk of hypesthesia/hypalgesia (P < .001) that was partly reversed with time. Decreased corneal sensibility was common after PRGR (P < .001) but not after PBC. Dysesthesia was more common after PRGR (23%) compared after PBC (4%; P < .001). Other side effects were noted but uncommon.

CONCLUSION: PBC and PRGR are both effective as primary surgical treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. Both carry a risk of postoperative hypesthesia, but in this series, the side effect profile favored PBC. Furthermore, PBC is technically less challenging, whereas PRGR requires fewer resources. Between these 2 techniques, we propose PBC as the primary surgical technique for percutaneous treatment of trigeminal neuralgia on the basis of its lower incidence of dysesthesia, corneal hypesthesia, and technical failures.

ABBREVIATIONS: MS, multiple sclerosisPBC, percutaneous balloon compressionPRGR, percutaneous retrogasserian glycerol rhizotomyTN, trigeminal neuralgiaThis is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work, provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 78, no 3, 421-428 p.
Keyword [en]
Balloon compression, Glycerol rhizotomy, Trigeminal neuralgia
National Category
Clinical Medicine
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-113954DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001059ISI: 000370438000028PubMedID: 26465639OAI: diva2:892079
Available from: 2016-01-08 Created: 2016-01-08 Last updated: 2016-05-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Asplund, PärBlomstedt, PatricBergenheim, A. Tommy
By organisation
Clinical Neuroscience
In the same journal
Clinical Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 63 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link