umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Replacing monocultures with mixed-species stands: Ecosystem service implications of two production forest alternatives in Sweden
Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet, SLU.
Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet, SLU.
Skogforsk.
Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet, SLU.
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: Ambio, ISSN 0044-7447, E-ISSN 1654-7209, Vol. 45, 124-139 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Whereas there is evidence that mixed-species approaches to production forestry in general can provide positive outcomes relative to monocultures, it is less clear to what extent multiple benefits can be derived from specific mixed-species alternatives. To provide such insights requires evaluations of an encompassing suite of ecosystem services, biodiversity, and forest management considerations provided by specific mixtures and monocultures within a region. Here, we conduct such an assessment in Sweden by contrasting even-aged Norway spruce (Picea abies)-dominated stands, with mixed-species stands of spruce and birch (Betula pendula or B. pubescens), or spruce and Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris). By synthesizing the available evidence, we identify positive outcomes from mixtures including increased biodiversity, water quality, esthetic and recreational values, as well as reduced stand vulnerability to pest and pathogen damage. However, some uncertainties and risks were projected to increase, highlighting the importance of conducting comprehensive interdisciplinary evaluations when assessing the pros and cons of mixtures.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 45, 124-139 p.
Keyword [en]
Climate change adaptation, Ecosystem services, Forestry, Mixed-forest stand, Polyculture, Resilience
National Category
Forest Science Social Sciences Interdisciplinary
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-115211DOI: 10.1007/s13280-015-0749-2ISI: 000372300000006OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-115211DiVA: diva2:899165
Projects
Future Forests
Note

Supplement: 2

Available from: 2016-02-01 Created: 2016-02-01 Last updated: 2017-11-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1530 kB)114 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1530 kBChecksum SHA-512
0c90f1aed23a0b7411fbf877336bfe4e0c1112cb8bd5bad89e79b92aabbef4209e87123434aa9a1cb6ed7546d514762bf5880141aa1e517e581946f8195f2031
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Keskitalo, E. Carina H.Sténs, Anna

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Keskitalo, E. Carina H.Sténs, Anna
By organisation
Department of Geography and Economic HistoryDepartment of historical, philosophical and religious studies
In the same journal
Ambio
Forest ScienceSocial Sciences Interdisciplinary

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 114 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 206 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf