umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Use of Carbonaceous Particle Exposure Metrics in Health Impact Calculations
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.
2016 (English)In: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, ISSN 1661-7827, E-ISSN 1660-4601, Vol. 13, no 3, 249Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Combustion-related carbonaceous particles seem to be a better indicator of adverse health effects compared to PM2.5 and PM10. Historical studies are based on black smoke (BS), but more recent studies use absorbance (Abs), black carbon (BC) or elemental carbon (EC) as exposure indicators. To estimate health risks based on BS, we review the literature regarding the relationship between Abs, BS, BC and EC. We also discuss the uncertainties associated with the comparison of relative risks (RRs) based on these conversions. EC is reported to represent a proportion between 5.2% and 27% of BS with a mean value of 12%. Correlations of different metrics at one particular site are higher than when different sites are compared. Comparing all traffic, urban and rural sites, there is no systematic site dependence, indicating that other properties of the particles or errors affect the measurements and obscure the results. It is shown that the estimated daily mortality associated with short-term levels of EC is in the same range as PM10, but this is highly dependent on the EC to BS relationship that is used. RRs for all-cause mortality associated with short-term exposure to PM10 seem to be higher at sites with higher EC concentrations, but more data are needed to verify this.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 13, no 3, 249
Keyword [en]
black smoke, elemental carbon, black carbon, urban air pollution, health effects, relative risk, PM10, combustion-related particles
National Category
Environmental Health and Occupational Health
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-117660DOI: 10.3390/ijerph13030249ISI: 000373528600032PubMedID: 26927139OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-117660DiVA: diva2:908682
Available from: 2016-03-03 Created: 2016-03-03 Last updated: 2017-11-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1516 kB)125 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1516 kBChecksum SHA-512
0c3a451b5a9f8dce8844749d43ffc135b5c23f9e7b25e7195b9b4ac8f16b1de0f93aed823112a1e4b3feb1f5cf74c24b12fd75d8dae7d4aef8e318a68188f289
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Forsberg, Bertil
By organisation
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
In the same journal
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Environmental Health and Occupational Health

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 125 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 119 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf