umu.sePublications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Recurrent stroke in symptomatic carotid stenosis awaiting revascularization: A pooled analysis
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine. Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine.
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: Neurology, ISSN 0028-3878, E-ISSN 1526-632X, Vol. 86, no 6, 498-504 p.Article in journal (Refereed) PublishedText
Abstract [en]

Objective: We aimed to quantify the risk and predictors of ipsilateral ischemic stroke in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis awaiting revascularization (carotid endarterectomy [CEA] or carotid artery stenting) by pooling individual patient data from recent prospective studies with high rates of treatment with modern stroke prevention medications.

Methods: Data were included from 2 prospective hospital-based registries (Umea, Barcelona) and one prospective population-based study (Dublin). Patients with symptomatic 50%-99% carotid stenosis eligible for carotid revascularization were included and followed for early recurrent ipsilateral stroke or retinal artery occlusion (RAO).

Results: Of 607 patients with symptomatic 50%-99% carotid stenosis, 377 met prespecified inclusion criteria. Ipsilateral recurrent ischemic stroke/RAO risk pre-revascularization was 2.7% (1 day), 5.3% (3 days), 11.5% (14 days), and 18.8% (90 days). On bivariate analysis, presentation with a cerebral vs ocular event was associated with higher recurrent stroke risk (log-rank p = 0.04). On multivariable Cox regression, recurrence was associated with older age (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] per 10-year increase 1.5, p = 0.02) with a strong trend for association with cerebral (stroke/TIA) vs ocular symptoms (adjusted HR 2.7, p = 0.06), but not degree of stenosis, smoking, vascular risk factors, or medications.

Conclusions: We found high risk of recurrent ipsilateral ischemic events within the 14-day time period currently recommended for CEA. Randomized trials are needed to determine the benefits and safety of urgent vs subacute carotid revascularization within 14 days after symptom onset.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 86, no 6, 498-504 p.
National Category
Neurology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-117380DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002354ISI: 000369541200003OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-117380DiVA: diva2:912753
Available from: 2016-03-17 Created: 2016-02-29 Last updated: 2016-03-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Johansson, EliasBjellerup, JakobWester, Per
By organisation
Department of Public Health and Clinical MedicineDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience
In the same journal
Neurology
Neurology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 14 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link