umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Shared decision making in Swedish community mental health services: an evaluation of three self-reporting instruments
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Social Work. (PAROS)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0790-9386
Show others and affiliations
2017 (English)In: Journal of Mental Health, ISSN 0963-8237, E-ISSN 1360-0567, Vol. 26, no 2, 142-149 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Despite the potential impact of shared decision making on users satisfaction with care and quality in health care decisions, there is a lack of knowledge and skills regarding how to work with shared decision making among health care providers. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of three instruments that measure varied dimensions of shared decision making, based on self-reports by clients, in a Swedish community mental health context. Method: The study sample consisted of 121 clients with experience of community mental health care, and involved in a wide range of decisions regarding both social support and treatment. The questionnaires were examined for face and content validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability and construct validity. Results: The instruments displayed good face and content validity, satisfactory internal consistency and a moderate to good level of stability in test-retest reliability with fair to moderate construct correlations, in a sample of clients with serious mental illness and experience of community mental health services in Sweden. Conclusions: The questionnaires are considered to be relevant to the decision making process, user-friendly and appropriate in a Swedish community mental health care context. They functioned well in settings where non-medical decisions, regarding social and support services, are the primary focus. The use of instruments that measure various dimensions of the self-reported experience of clients, can be a key factor in developing knowledge of how best to implement shared decision making in mental health services.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2017. Vol. 26, no 2, 142-149 p.
Keyword [en]
Recovery, mental illness, questionnaire, shared decision making, reliability, validity
National Category
Social Work
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-120217DOI: 10.1080/09638237.2016.1207223ISI: 000399610500008PubMedID: 27452763OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-120217DiVA: diva2:927238
Funder
Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare
Available from: 2016-05-11 Created: 2016-05-11 Last updated: 2017-08-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Rosenberg, David
By organisation
Department of Social Work
In the same journal
Journal of Mental Health
Social Work

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 87 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf