umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Att kvotera eller inte kvotera: Debatten i riksdagen
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
2016 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Abstract

This study investigates how the eight swedish parliamentary parties arguments regarding gender quotas. The timeboundary is set between the years 2010-2014. The purpose of this study is to investigate how the swedish parliamentary parties argument for and against a legislation of gender quotas on corporate boards. Since women are underrepresented in corporate boards, a theory of feminism was appopirate. In order to perform this study the teory is based on the three main perspectives of feminism, liberal, radical and socialist feminism. This is presented through a analysis based on feminist ideas in the political parties argumentation within the labor force committee in the swedish parliament. The results presented a huge divide within the question of equality and how the political parties presented solutions in order to resolve the issue of underrepresentation of women in corporate boards.

 

The political parties to the left point out that the main problem lies within patriarchy which correspond to more radical feminist thoughts. The political parties to the left pointed out liberal feminist ways resolving the issue of equality and legislation in corporate boards. Conclusions made from this study is that the majority of the swedish parliamentary parties mix arguments and ideas from all of the three feminist perspectives. All of the parties standpoints can be related to how they are placed in a right-left scale.

 

 

Keywords: gender quota, corporate boards, sweden, feminism, liberal feminism, radical feminism, socialist feminism, parliamentary parties, political parties

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. , 41 p.
National Category
Public Administration Studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-120588OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-120588DiVA: diva2:929169
Educational program
Bachelor of Science in Public Administration
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2016-06-13 Created: 2016-05-17 Last updated: 2016-06-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Att kvotera eller inte kvotera - debatten i riksdagen(315 kB)190 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 315 kBChecksum SHA-512
7f89403e0b736350b992d0f689c3028c7ce616e0ef2c3a66acc2a8bfa0c385f2a07840b4981f7a1b95ebe82224127f48bc1efab9da84da10fb742da5d427efac
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Political Science
Public Administration Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 190 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 189 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf