umu.sePublications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
What are the core ideas behind the Precautionary Principle?
Umeå University, Faculty of Arts, Department of historical, philosophical and religious studies.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5000-948X
2016 (English)In: Science of the Total Environment, ISSN 0048-9697, E-ISSN 1879-1026, Vol. 557-558, 134-141 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The Precautionary Principle is both celebrated and criticized. It has become an important principle for decision making, but it is also subject to criticism. One problem that is often pointed out with the principle is that is not clear what it actually says and how to use it. I have taken on this problem by performing an analysis of some of the most influential formulations of the principle in an attempt to identify the core ideas behind it, with the purpose of producing a formulation of the principle that is clear and practically applicable.

It was found that what is called the Precautionary Principle is not a principle that tells us what do to achieve extra precaution or how to handle situations when extra precaution is called for. Instead, it was found to be a list of circumstances that each justify extra precaution. An analysis of some of the most common and influential formulations of the Precautionary Principle identified four such circumstances: (1) When we deal with important values that tend to be systematically downplayed by traditional decision methods – such as human health and the environment. (2) When we suspect that the decision might lead to irreversible and severe consequences and the values at stake are also irreplaceable, (3) When timing is at least as important as being right. (4) When it is more important to avoid false negatives than false positives.

This interpretation of the Precautionary Principle does not say anything about what kind of actions to take when extra precaution is called for, but it does provide a clear and practically useful list of circumstances that call for extra precaution and that is not subject to the most common objections to the Precautionary Principle.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 557-558, 134-141 p.
Keyword [en]
Irreversibility, irreplaceable values, epistemic values, environmental values, Rio declaration, precaution
National Category
Philosophy
Research subject
Ethics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-121246DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.034ISI: 000375136200014PubMedID: 26994801OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-121246DiVA: diva2:931662
Available from: 2016-05-30 Created: 2016-05-30 Last updated: 2016-07-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Persson, Erik
By organisation
Department of historical, philosophical and religious studies
In the same journal
Science of the Total Environment
Philosophy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 17 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link